Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of CBA playoff series[edit]

List of CBA playoff series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On the surface, this list seems to be against WP:NOTSTATS, as it is simply a list of CBA playoff series, and WP is not a sports almanac. Article also only has one source, which isn't independent. Perhaps these should be redirected to individual seasons. Spf121188 (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Vinnylospo, I would encourage you to take a look at WP:NOTSTATS, and if you want the page kept (which I understand, since you published the page,) you'll need to find a way to demonstrate why this article should keep it's own space by way of WP policy rather than asserting it's perceived importance. Bagumba actually brings up a good alternative, by making a subsection on Chinese Basketball Association, also they bring up that all of the sources on this article are simply stat pages, with zero secondary or tertiary sources. Spf121188 (talk) 13:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per WP:NOTSTATS, this article does not have much if any encyclopedic content. With it all being based from one source, it is basically just copying and restating what is already mentioned on that source. Also reads like a directory, aka WP:NOTDIRECTORY.Rollidan (talk) 22:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 08:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply