The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Letha Weapons[edit]

Letha Weapons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the GNG. All the refs are trivial coverage or name drops along with other porn stars with hugely augmented busts. Wouldn't have even passed the later versions of PORNBIO. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:12, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nom couldn’t have put it better. “Huge fake boobs” is not a sufficient rationale on its own to keep. Dronebogus (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we lack enough coverage in the article or elsewhere to justify having an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.