The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Kenck[edit]

Larry Kenck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Chair of a state-level party affiliate fails WP:NPOL. Other deletion discussions for people in the same position have indicated that the position is not inherently notable for an officeholder who has not served in other, more notable positions. KidAd • SPEAK 22:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the sourcing here does not show any actual passing of GNG, and the position itself does not grant default notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. State-level party chair is not an "inherently" notable role per WP:NPOL, but this article depends almost entirely on primary sources rather than reliable ones, and is thus not sourced anywhere near well enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to hold a notable political office. Bearcat (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.