The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Kakegurui – Compulsive Gambler characters#Kirari Momobami. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kirari Momobami[edit]

Kirari Momobami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the page might not be notable. All other Kakegurui characters are listed on the page List of Kakegurui – Compulsive Gambler characters, including the main character (Yumeko Jabami); the only thing that makes this subject stand out is due to cosplay, which I don't believe is enough of a reason to create a page. Vortex (talk) 04:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as I am not really seeing any deletion rationale here? WP:WAX isn't a solid argument and you haven't addressed as to why the sources used in the article wouldn't establish notability. It is a bit strange as to why a secondary character has their own article over the main character of the series, but hey... sometimes its just how things end up in life. I will also note that the nom has made very few edits outside of this deletion discussion which is something for the closing admin to keep in mind. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Kakegurui – Compulsive Gambler characters. As written, I concur WP:GNG is not met, we have some information that she has been cosplayed at (newsflash: it's hard to find an anime character that hasn't...) and a sentence about her from the series review - I am afraid that doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. Sadly, the article is just a plot summary and such, and unless reception can be improved, a redirect is the best outcome. I'll note that I watched the show, spend few minutes looking for sources now and got nothing :( --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as per Piotrus. Does not meet WP:GNG, so a redirect as ATD is appropriate. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Kakegurui – Compulsive Gambler characters#Kirari Momobami While I agree with other editors above that the nominator's rational is weak (there are some cases where a non-main character is more notable than the main character, such as with Zero Two in Darling in the Franxx), I don't believe that this meets WP:GNG. The review cited is okay and maybe one source but that's just one and GNG requires two or more. The other sources appear to be trivial coverage or unreliable. Link20XX (talk) 18:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to List of Kakegurui – Compulsive Gambler characters#Kirari Momobami The reception section is decent enough to preserve it, and it would fit in well at this page. The rest is just plot summary, so it's better to redirect it. Mlb96 (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.