The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to BirdLife Australia#Awards. Star Mississippi 18:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Hobbs Medal[edit]

John Hobbs Medal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. 1 hit in gnews, nothing in trove.nla.gov.au other coverage merely confirms people won the award. LibStar (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• KeepOppose. The article is essentially a list of mostly notable people who share the award because of their notable achievements. It provides useful information by bringing them together as a group. Maias (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maias. I have taken the liberty and "standardised" your !vote. Aoziwe (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to BirdLife Australia, where it's already mentioned. I'm not sure a full list of recipients is needed, particularly as many don't appear notable. --Michig (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to BirdLife Australia#Awards. The subject is of relative importance in the field of interest it is awarded for and is a likely search term. The list is not specifically notable in its own right, but would add valuable due weight content to the BirdLife Australia#Awards section. If this had been PRODed I may well have BOLDly done so. Aoziwe (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.