The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Island Fever (film series)[edit]

Island Fever (film series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable film series that lacks reliable secondary sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage could not found. Article exclusively cited to industry publicity materials and other PR-like coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete puffery. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails the WP:GNG for lack of RS coverage. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails WP:GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG and no evidence.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.