The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 10:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Idhika Paul[edit]

Idhika Paul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously R2 deleted but author recreated. It seems WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NACTOR TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Passes WP:GNG and WP:ENT in my opinion. A WP:BEFORE is necessary. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 16:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are in fact aware of sources that would show WP:GNG, it would be good if you could add them to the article. At the moment there are two sources, neither of which does anything to show notability. --bonadea contributions talk 18:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I tried finding sources, but yes, it is true that she fails WP:GNG. Almost no coverage in secondary sources. Also the name of the article was really confusing. As far as I knew, she was Tumpa Paul, not Idhika. So that was really confusing. But Bonadea ruled out the matter. Wonder how he knows so much, and I being a Bengali also did not know the fact that Idhika Paul was created as an alternative to Tumpa Paul, which could also be a WP:UPE. Thanks for keeping Wikipedia free of UPE articles. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Claim of passing NACTOR needs to be backed up by reliable sources, explaining the significance of these roles which is absent here. Having linked articles may help but is not guaranteed without presenting verifiable evidence. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumpa Paul about the same actor, as well as the deletion logs of Tumpa Paul, Draft:Tumpa Paul and Draft:Paul Tumpa]; there's a history of UPE, and of recreating the article in mainspace after it has been draftified or declined in AfC (sound familiar?). It is clear from a WP:BEFORE search that WP:ENT is not met, and as for WP:GNG there's no sign of any secondary and independent sources, and no in-depth coverage in the primary/non-independent sources that show up. --bonadea contributions talk 18:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I found a similar creation Megha Daw by same editor that fails WP:ENT and looks like a WP:BLP1E. Tagging @Ab207 and Bonadea: for having a look if they wish. 2402:3A80:6A7:982F:CD3F:73E8:3A3:22CE (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Neither the subject is passing WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG independently. ManaliJain (talk) 12:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.