The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While I have been in general in favor of the redirects, JPL and asilvering make a case for why the red link might be more helpful to article development. Star Mississippi 02:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henrique Camargo[edit]

Henrique Camargo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks significant coverage. The article also does not meet our Olympic inclusion guidelines. A search for more infomation found no more information on this person. However there is an actor of the same name who has had roles in 2 films in the last year. So this is not a suitable target for redirect since it is not at all clear this person is who people would be searching for if they enter this name. I found some other results for this name, but the other results than the actor all seemed either to have Henrique as the middle name with the person normally using the first name as well, or Camargo was the middle name/maybe apellido primero (primary surname) with a name following Camargo. In those cases I did not look closely enough to figure out if Camargo was even going to show up in all searchs for the person. There is no reason to suppose this is the most close to notable person with this name, and so it is not at all a good target for a redirect. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• • This article was while I was in the process of creating the AfD unilaterally redirected by the creator. This seems a very irregular action since there was a notice of a deletion discussion on the article. Also as I explained in my nomination it is a very poor redirect target.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Rowing at the 1936 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed four, per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE. The full AfD process took the nom the best part of an hour to complete, hence the original redirect. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I explained above that there is an actor who is most likely a much better target for this name, and there may be others, so this is not at all a good candidate for a redirect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with the case against a redirect for this. Lots of google hits coming up for "Henrique Camargo" or "(Something) Henrique Camargo"; the redirect would probably confuse more readers than it would aid. I don't know that it's all that useful to retain the edit history of a one-line stub in this case. -- asilvering (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not suitable for redirect per above comments. Cbl62 (talk) 14:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Lugnuts. If we actually create an article on the actor, that would change things, but until then, this is fine really. Smartyllama (talk) 15:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.