- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Happy New Year (2011 film)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Happy New Year (2011 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film still has no evidence of production. Source provide indicates an "untitled romantic comedy", only actors are provided. BOVINEBOY2008 17:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If the situation is same as in the last AFD, then we can add the {{db-repost}} template. So I recommend a speedy close and adding the template. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)(Struck out recommendation. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]- Not the same situation as last November. The beginning of principle filming has now been confirmed. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This time, Keep and expand and further source. In June 1010, One India reported filming was to begin August 2010.[1] This was repeated in Mangalore News.[2] So last November it failed WP:NFF. However, in December 2010, principle filming was confirmed when One India reported that weather had (temporarily) halted it.[3]
More coverage in January 2011 when Times of India reported that while the film had been on hold for two years, its being picked up again had given "new life" to Yamla Pagla Deewana.[4]At the end of Film Journal reported that Sunny Deol and Kangana Ranaut had finished New York shots for the film,[5] and in February 2011, South Asia Mail announced completion of productionand plans for a worldwide rlease.[6] This time it is not too soon, as priciple filming hasfinishedbeen confirmed. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Keep per sufficient notability, though the article could reflect this coverage. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll do some work on it... but will also invite User:Sodabottle. He's my go-to guy for Indian cinema. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds good! To verify, this film is titled Yamla Pagla Deewana, right? I added that to the article but was not 100% sure. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. Different film. So I took it out. Yamla Pagla Deewana was released in December 2010 and was being promoted by Sunny Deol when he was finishing the New York portion of Happy New Year. But thanks. :) Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds good! To verify, this film is titled Yamla Pagla Deewana, right? I added that to the article but was not 100% sure. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll do some work on it... but will also invite User:Sodabottle. He's my go-to guy for Indian cinema. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw. I put the AfD without doing a good enough search for sources. Thank you for the catch Michael. BOVINEBOY2008 00:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It was a good AFD nomination of recreated material... but the fact that it had finally entered principle filming was not some major headline. Had I not taken a look and ammended it, the darn thing might have been deleted... or even for copyvio. Compare the earlier "Production" text[7] with its original single source.[8] Yikes. I was glad to be able to correct this as I added additional sources. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.