The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great Big Island[edit]

Great Big Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since creation in 2008. No significant coverage on google, newspapers.com, etc. Fails WP:CORP Alyo (chat·edits) 07:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Alyo (chat·edits) 07:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Alyo (chat·edits) 07:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Alyo (chat·edits) 07:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Did a deeper search through local newspapers on NewsBank (including The Olympian) and only found one result: this 2004 piece on an employee that mentions the business model in passing. SounderBruce 07:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:CORP is not the relevant yardstick for labels; WP:MUSIC is the better controlling guideline. However, this is barely a label in the usual sense of the word, and more a contract-based live-recording distributor; it appears to be operating almost entirely as a releaser of quasi-official CD-R concert recordings. So as a label, it doesn't pass muster, and I'm not surprised there doesn't seem to be enough RS coverage to meet GNG. Chubbles (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, couldn't find any coverage in independent sources significantly. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.