The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goth (board game)[edit]

Goth (board game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Non-notable board game. SL93 (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 18:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am able to find multiple places currently selling this as a product, but nothing seems to come up as an RS on initial search. Jclemens (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because of no significant coverage. It is not notable. ThePremiumBoy (talk) 07:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Outside of sales pages and database sites like BGG, I am finding no coverage at all on this game. As the creator, developer, and publisher all appear to be non-notable themselves, there is no place to redirect or Merge to as an WP:ATD. Rorshacma (talk) 17:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is probably the most awesome delete !vote I've seen. Good job. Jclemens (talk) 04:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.