Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Game Prattana[edit]

Game Prattana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The available sources there is YouTube. Reading BeansTalk to the Beans 20:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment broadcast of this TV series has already started. Plenty of coverage from Google news search [1] --Lerdsuwa (talk) 09:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural keep, seeing as no valid rationale for deletion has been forthcoming. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify. The current article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Youtube is one thing, but the article has several references to Facebook and Instagram as well. This is simply not good enough. Draftifying will give ample time to sort this out, since the topic seems like it may have notability. Geschichte (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also think draftification encapsules all the prior comments/wishes from other discussion participants. Geschichte (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I generally do not think draftifying is a good solution. An article will see more chance of improvement in Mainspace, and should remain there unless there are major policy concerns. The Facebook references are to a page reporting on TV ratings. Thai organizations often use Facebook pages as a web host, so citing them should not be a problem in itself as long the source is reputable (though I have not been able to confirm this for the specific case). --Paul_012 (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to see if GNG compliant sourcing can be identified
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply