The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Finance Magnates[edit]

Finance Magnates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable PR magazine. Most of their articles are basically press releases by different companies. Not suitable for an encyclopedia. Jared Duckett (talk) 08:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we need more news coverage on it. Not enough exists. Chelokabob (talk) 23:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sure, it exists, but no indications of notability and references fail the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.