- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Faria Abdullah (actress)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Faria Abdullah (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable personality, no multiple lead roles in movies. Juggyevil (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Music. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:G4 as deleted at the previous AfD. Nothing much has changed since except a cameo in Most Eligible Bachelor which does not contribute to NACTOR requirements. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faria Abdullah. This appears to be a case of gaming of names by adding an unnecessary disambiguation. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Faria Abdullah
- It should not be necessary to review the references after a previous AFD when there is no indication of any change, but the references have been reviewed, and none of them contribute to general notability because none of them are secondary, because they are interviews, publicity, and glamour coverage:
| Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Hindu | Interview | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| 2 | New Indian Express | Interview | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| 3 | Telugu Cinema | A story about the filming of a film | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 4 | Telangana Today | Another interview | No | Yes | No | |
| 5 | Times of India | Publicity about an upcoming film | Yes | No | No | No |
| 6 | Telugu News 18 | Publicity and glamour photos | No | No | ||
| 7 | Fashion World Hub | Glamour photos of subject and other actresses | No | No | No |
- The filmography does not support acting notability because it lists only one significant role, a minor role, an item number, and an unreleased film.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, as per Robert McClenon's assessment above. Does not meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 16:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per G4. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.