The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elbert Barr[edit]

Elbert Barr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hasn't received any significant coverage, only mentioned in databases or in passing in results. Being allowed to play once because many actual pro players withdrew is not sufficient when the actual coverage is missing. Fram (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks coverage that rises to the level of passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Barr may technically pass WP:NTENNIS, but I agree that an SNG pass isn't enough to overcome a GNG failure in this context. Since my search for GNG-qualifying coverage didn't find anything significant (only the same sorts of database entries and trivial mentions that Fram found), he isn't notable at the moment. Given Barr's youth, it's certainly possible that he may receive significant coverage in the future; administrators should feel free to restore the article if that ends up happening. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.