The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duma Polska[edit]

Duma Polska (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties and certainly not when they have very little credible third party sources, little to no impact, no notable people involved or as candidates, and barely 1% of votes cast. Nominated because notability guidelines simply not met. doktorb _words^deeds 04:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 04:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 04:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Europe and Poland. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not seeing how they meet WP:NORG or WP:NPOL at this time. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Forvana (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.