The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dipak Adhikari[edit]

Dipak Adhikari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a political figure, whose only stated claim of notability is as vice-president of a student organization. This is not an "inherently" notable role per WP:NPOL, but is one where people get articles only if they can be shown to clear WP:GNG on their sourcing -- but two of the three footnotes here just tangentially verify the existence of the organization without mentioning Dipak Adhikari or his role at all, and the third just glancingly namechecks his existence a single time in an article where he's in no way the subject. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced profoundly better than this. Bearcat (talk) 18:11, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:11, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:11, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a search is complicated by there being other (notable) people of the same name, but as far as I can see, this one isn’t. Mccapra (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. All the hallmarks of Curious boy km. Clearly not a good faith editor either way[1]. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That article move definitely wasn't appropriate, so I've reverted it — but the article itself isn't properly sourced as notable either, so I've also initiated an AFD discussion on it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Adhikari. Bearcat (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable person. Vitaium (talk) 04:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, WP:POLOUTCOMES, WP:MILL, and WP:GNG. Political party functionaries are not inherently notable. Bearian (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.