The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Per creator's request Star Mississippi 01:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Evans (singer-songwriter)[edit]

Christine Evans (singer-songwriter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability Nswix (talk) 23:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I made this a long time ago, without citations. If possible, I would like this to be moved to my user space (e.g. User:Thivierr/sandbox or draftspace, or whatever is easy) and I may be able to provide appropriate citations and details to justify inclusion. A quick look at ProQuest shows some relevant hits, but I don't yet know if there's enough to justify an article. In its current state, the article can't be justified. --Rob (talk) 03:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment I'm fine with this if it can be expanded on. I'm not on a crusade to have this deleted.

  Nswix (talk) 03:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Drafity As a good WP:ATD CT55555(talk) 04:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify per nom and creator. Suriname0 (talk) 02:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy or draftify per request. This is an old article (created in 2005) that met the inclusion and referencing standards of that time, but has obviously not kept up with the evolution in those standards over the intervening years — so it certainly doesn't meet contemporary requirements in this state, but the creator is a long-established Wikipedia contributor who's still around and should be given every opportunity to see if he can repair it. There are indeed hits in ProQuest that can be used; I don't know enough about her to fix this myself, but if Rob can't get into ProQuest to retrieve them, I'm willing to pull some PDFs. Bearcat (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Draft per request above.  // Timothy :: talk  10:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.