The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CHUMBA Racing[edit]

CHUMBA Racing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Needs broader conversation than PROD. Possibly the best source, but questions remain as to RS level, and it's not enough for GNG. There are listings such as this and similar present in the article, but there's no indication they're independent and definitely not of the in depth required for WP:ORG. They're currently described as a blog site related to betting on cycling, but that doesn't appear to have engendered any more coverage than their time as a bike manufacturer. Star Mississippi 18:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG. No indepth significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 23:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.