- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Baltinava[edit]
- Baltinava (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references. Needs references. It's... MR BERTY! talk/stalk 19:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- keep – Click the geolocation link. Follow the Google link in find sources, the first three links are sources, or follow the lv.wiki link - be WP:BOLD Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 19:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. —Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 20:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Looks like a town to me. Latvian Wikipedia references a Latvian print encyclopedia. Needing references is reason to place a needs references tag, not for AfD. --Oakshade (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep I've added the refs from the Latvian article - and discovered I'd got a talk page there too even though I've never edited there yet. Refs don't have to be in English, although it is preferred. Peridon (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Verified villages are notable per consensus. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.