The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stuart Parker (politician). RL0919 (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BC Ecosocialists[edit]

BC Ecosocialists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived party that never fielded a candidate in an election. It never got much coverage and most of the references currently in the article are links to the party's website (and are all dead now). Its leader was Stuart Parker who is notable in his own right but in relation to the Ecosocialists, he only received coverage for his resignation following allegations of transphobia. Pichpich (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete and Merge with Stuart Parker (politician) - The party seems closely linked to Stuart Parker, and seems to have imploded when he resigned due to allegedly transphobic comments. I think it can be paired down and merged with his article. It is probably not notable enough on its own, given that it failed to run any candidates and is no longer even registered.[1]--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 23:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be ok with a merge and redirect. Pichpich (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Practically, that probably means preserving the article in draft until the merge is complete. Unless we are going to complete the merge before this AfD is closed and the article deleted.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 00:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Stuart Parker (politician). There's no need to complete the merge before the AFD closes - normally that's done after, once consensus is confirmed. Nfitz (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.