The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Three idents[edit]

BBC Three idents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see why this article exists. This should be summarised and added to the main BBC Three article. ComplainingCamel (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep No rationale for deletion given. Artw (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete We're not Logopedia, and many of the sources are abused to being used twenty times throughout the article or just dispersed among three or four originally-researched sites, along with unacceptable Twitter and YouTube sourcing. And contrary to the nominator, don't add this sludge to the BBC Three article, because it doesn't help a reader understand the television network itself. Nate • (chatter) 03:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just seen that much of this information is already on the main article, (I know, typical newbie behaviour), in a section called "Presentation", further decreasing the importance of this article. | ComplainingCamel (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not important article for me. Additionally, these idents are fake and are a mock/fanmade. 114.125.236.179 (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Most of these BBC Three idents are mock and not existed. Unless there needs a cleanup, this article should be deleted without question or merge into main BBC Three article. 202.67.42.7 (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I have no idea what those people are going on about images being mock/fanmade, unless they're looking at a different page... Anyway, I think the page could probably be better placed in the main BBC Three page, using alternative free images to demonstrate a similar point between style changes, except maybe keeping the three hands. Plus, certain sections do go on and being moved might give the information an opportunity to be condensed by having wider exposure to editors and people viewing the main article. Regarding Wikipedia policy, the number of fair use images is borderline excessive and, repeating what I just said, the available logos are definitely reasonable, e.g. the 2008 logo instead of the 2013 ident. If someone wants to try that idea, BBC Three#History has some ok info, which would just need a few images added and stuff about design. — Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 13:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to main BBC Three article given that most of these idents aired by BBC Three are recreation and not necessary to be included. 125.167.58.242 (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.