The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan–Tunisia relations[edit]

Azerbaijan–Tunisia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of this article is based on a primary source, the Azerbaijan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. There are no aspects to these relations that add to notability like embassies, state visits, significant trade or migration. The 2 cultural aspects mentioned seem to be minor factoids. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Tunisia, and Azerbaijan. LibStar (talk) 23:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. There does not seem to be WP:SIGCOV that could establish notability. Yilloslime (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.