The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 08:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anupam Mittal[edit]

Anupam Mittal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned BLP on an unremarkable businessperson. Significant RS coverage not found. Article cited to online directories, passing metions, WP:SPIP or other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created and edited by a number of blocked socks; sample: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jiteshdugar. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The first reference seems alright, but is quite self-promotional, this is good but weaves and uses too much quoting from himself to make it a reliable source (it's too much on primary). On that case delete. !dave 18:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lots of advertising trying to sell how good and influential his company is, no sources to back it up or show that it is actually impactful.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.