The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 21:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Heaton[edit]

Andrew Heaton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequate independent, in-depth coverage. Tame (talk) 18:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Here's a JSTOR link here mentioning him on Page 3 - I'm not sure how to cite it / work it into the article exactly

https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30807?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22Andrew+Heaton%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522Andrew%2BHeaton%2522%26acc%3Don%26wc%3Don%26so%3Drel&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_phrase_search%2Fcontrol&refreqid=fastly-default%3A18a057fac940d9778424fa69a6588ebe&seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donatj (talk • contribs) 22:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Donatjm passing mentions are not in-depth coverage. see Wikipedia:What is significant coverage? Tame (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:ANYBIO. KidAd • SPEAK 00:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree. Fails WP:ANYBIO MaskedSinger (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The books appear to be self-published. Many links are not independent. He does write for Reason but that doesn't establish notability. I am perplexed regarding the Los Angeles Press Club awards. The organization looks active, as per its web site, but I don't find much *about* the organization. Its WP article is barely a stub. Lamona (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. Megtetg34 (talk) 07:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:ANYBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.