The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 22:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All Action Wrestling[edit]

All Action Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All Action Wrestling

No references, and so does not satisfy the core content policy of verifiability. Does not explain how any of general notability, corporate notability, or sports notability are satisfied. This article was moved to draft space once by User:Discospinster as inadequately sourced, and moved back to article space with no improvement. A case could be made for A7, but a deletion discussion is a better idea. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom, in particular because as he has noted, it was moved to draftspace for being unsourced, and still remains unsourced, and now back in mainspace. Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete or speedy move back to Draft. Not main space ready in multiple ways. Aoziwe (talk) 10:47, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination, or bare minimum, Move back to draft if there are notable sources out there. Spf121188 (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom MyNewBall88 (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.