The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alanoud Production[edit]

Alanoud Production (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-referenced promo stub about a non-notable business. The three sources all appear less than WP:RS, and one at most provides sigcov of the company itself, as opposed to its founder. Search finds nothing of substance, either. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails NCORP as there are lack any in depth coverage about the firm. Cirton (talk) 07:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The only source that discusses the company in depth is this one, and I'm very skeptical that it's genuinely independent: it describes the subject in florid terms and suspiciously lacks a byline. The remaining sources do not provide the company significant coverage since they only mention it in passing while discussing something else. I see that several new sources have been added since the nomination, but they suffer from the same flaw: a lack of significant coverage of the company itself. My searches did not identify any NCORP-qualifying coverage either. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom, fails WP:GNG and NCORP. Ginbopewz (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.