The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aiden Starr[edit]

Aiden Starr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nonscene awards, only nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. Previously deleted uncontroversially. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the poorly-sourced BLP. Also, salt the title, to ensure the previous unanimous deletion discussion is enforced.—S Marshall T/C
  • Salting is used to prevent the recreation of articles which have already been repeatedly recreated so many times that they have become a disturbance. This is only the article's second AfD, salting it is completely unnecessary. It's recreation isn't even the same as the one which was previously deleted via AfD. Rebecca1990 (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just trying to keep my watchlist shorter. But okay, onto the watchlist it goes.—S Marshall T/C 02:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - awards: 1x won, 7x nominated, number of films: 320 as actress, 2 as director... Subtropical-man talk
  (en-2) 14:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The award win is scene-related, which is excluded by PORNBIO. Porn award nominations no longer count in PORNBIO. And X-number of porn films is not an indicator of notability. That criterion was excluded from PORNBIO years ago. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails PORNBIO and GNG as the nominator states. No reliable source coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not meet the relevant notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with views expressed by Johnpacklambert & Gene93k. Finnegas (talk) 23:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.