The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_TLC#Current_programming. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

90-day fiancé[edit]

90-day fiancé (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article on a television series gives no reasons for why it is notable, and cites only one source, which is the website of the channel the program aired on. I did a search for reliable sources to cite for this show and I'm coming up short. Hustlecat ^{do it!} 20:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Hustlecat ^{do it!} 20:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 20:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_TLC#Current_programming for now. I do think that we should leave the article's history intact, though. The reason is that I did manage to find some coverage of the show, but it's a lot lighter than I like for television shows and I didn't really find any true reviews of the show in general. There's enough to where I think that it will get more as the show continues to air, but it's still a little light. I've fixed the title- it looks like the channel itself does not spell fiance with an accent, so I've moved the page to match the official title. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect:- Tokyogirl79 has figured out strong points. Redirect will be much better option than delete.Shashanksinghvi334 (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.