Hello, Vidatafazoli, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Masssly – —M@sssly✉ 20:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

—M@sssly^✉ 20:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Miss Grand International page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Miss Colombia  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please stop creating totally unsourced articles (as you did with Miss Gambia, Miss Syria and Miss Greenland). All articles created, and all material added, must be provided with reliable sources to establish notability, because Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog or a fan forum. So please read Wikipedia's rules about notability, verifiability, what constitutes reliable sources and how to cite sources/references before creating any more articles. Thomas.W ^talk 10:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please only add relevant information to articles and templates. An edit like this is utterly useless has it bears no relevant information. The Banner talk 11:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Idem for Miss Chinese Taipei The Banner talk 12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you doing? Your edit on Miss Internacional Chile is a complete useless and senseless exercise. It comes close to vandalism. Please stop with those edits. The Banner talk 17:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the modifiers in the flag icons. Doing so would be historically inaccurate even though in some cases there is just a slight difference with the modern flag than the historical flag, (like in the case of the Philippines (adopted in 1986)
(adopted since 1998) which has a different shade of blue) or radically different just the case of South Africa (adopted 1928) and (adopted since 1994). A Miss South Africa representative won't be represented by the newer flag pre-1994 during the Apartheid period because the flag doesn't exist yet at that time. Just like the Soviet Union's representative won't be represented by the Russian flag instead of the Soviet Union flag.

Maybe you are not aware of this function of the flagicon template. I assume Good faith. Here some use guidelines.

{{flagicon|Hong Kong}} displays as while
{{flagicon|Hong Kong|colonial}} displays as

"colonial" or a year eg. "1956" (which usually refers when that particular flag is adopted. would determine which historical flag to use. To determine which values are valid refer to "Template:Country data X" where "X" is the country in question. To determine the range of when a particular flag is used refer to "Flag of X" articles where "X" is the country in question.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marina Jacoby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Jacoby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kezia Warouw, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://player.mashpedia.com/player.php?q=xO7XIF3jwns.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop with adding fake links to Template:Miss Universe 2016 delegates. You should only add names there of delegates with their own article present. No red links or other useless links. The Banner talk 08:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connie Jiménez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Jiménez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 09:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Connie Jiménez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Ríos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Miss World 2005 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It makes no sense for you to remove inline citations to reliable sources that verify content in the article. Please stop this vandalism. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Miss Seychelles, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC) Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.[reply]

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Paraguay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ntandoyenkosi Kunene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ntandoyenkosi Kunene until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 02:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not removed citation needed tag unless you have provided an independent, third party reliable source or add unsourced or original content, as you did to Miss World Myanmar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Richie Campbell (talk) 13:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vidatafazoli, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Kezia Warouw has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Ntandoyenkosi Kunene has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not add useless mentions to navigation templates. Only links to subjects with their own article should be mentioned in a navigation template. The rest will be removed. The Banner talk 12:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:Miss Universe 2016 delegates, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. repeatedly adding links to nothing to navigation templates The Banner talk 16:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Miss Venezuela has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop adding unsourced entries and pageant that is not notable like Miss Supranational. This pageant was deleted 5 times in Wikipedia because it's not notable. Richie Campbell (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Bezděková is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Bezděková until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 23:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Miss Universe 2016 delegates. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Adding links to non-existing articles The Banner talk 17:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Greenland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Greenland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 12:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added you to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colombiabeauty The Banner talk 09:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Miss Universe titleholders. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. The adding of a crystal ball, as you did on many articles, is not usefull. Only when you have serious and sourced content a new line in a table should be made. Filling a line with mostly blanc spaces or TBA is disruptive and useless. The Banner talk 17:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Miss Universe 2016 delegates. The Banner talk 08:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Miss Universe 2016 delegates. The Banner talk 22:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Miss World 2010 page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Miss Finland page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vidatafazoli. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connie Jiménez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susana Rivadeneira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Bezděková is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Kalousová (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.