So I looked over the articles. On The Bench is pretty good. Right now the only gripe I'd have is that a show on the air for 10 days might not be notable since it really can't have been covered in outside media. But I'll try my best to defend it if it comes up for deletion.

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its looking better. I made a couple of minor edits and will try to get to it more this week. Also, its probably a better idea if only Tegan Summer uses this account and any other individuals contributing use their own accounts (they don't need to be their real names, it could be RandomBrit or any other name). I still want to reword some things with other actor names, etc, but I can tackle that another day. MBisanz ^talk 03:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I found a reference for the The Knights Of Mary Phagan bit (actually the Backstage West article did mention this, and the other reference I found mentioned your name). I'm afraid I've readded the [citation needed] tag to the sentence referring to your heritage because it is not verifiable. You might find it useful to read Wikipedia:Verifiability for the policy on this. Basically, all facts need to be able to be checked by readers. I can see why you want it in the article, but it needs to backed up. Although I'm inclined to believe that you are Tegan Summer, it is completely possible that you are in fact a fan who would like people to believe that your parents are Barbadian. Also, the name of your wife is unreferenced. Again, it is possible that your no. 1 fan (called Molly Reynolds!) added this. This is fairly unlikely, but I'm sure you would agree that it is possible. It's really important that Wikipedia is verifiable. So, if you can think of any published sources contain references to these personal biographical details, please add them. First-party sources (eg. your own website) would be ok in this context. Anyway, thanks for working with other editors on this. It might be an idea if you try not to edit the actual article, but add suggestions to the talkpage. I will leave a welcome message below that has some useful links. I hope you stick around and contribute to other articles of interest to you. --BelovedFreak 16:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't worry about the orange tags on top. Their just things to encourage people to expand the article and add citations. Its only the red tags that need immediate action. MBisanz ^talk 16:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tegan Summer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BelovedFreak 16:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ok, I went through and fixed them. If you could edit these pages Image:On the Bench Logo.png, Image:Sabra Williams.png to remove the text "See [1] for confirmation." that would wrap up all license issues. Should ?Image:Deadly7Lust.png appear in an article? MBisanz ^talk 19:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I've added the reference to the article, that's much better now. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. --BelovedFreak 09:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TSP_Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tegan, I'll handle the above issue. Since we're going to wait for more news coverage of the production company before it gets an article, we'll just delete the picture until that time as well. Once it does become notable, I can undelete the image with a single mouseclick, so no need to worry. Thanks. MBisanz ^talk 07:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category changed. MBisanz ^talk 21:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, well done on the new article. I have gone through it and formatted the citations properly. For future reference, I use the templates at Wikipedia:Citation templates, always within <ref></ref> tags, and then at the bottom of the page, I put a References section, with either <References /> or {{Reflist}}.

A few other things:

• I removed some of the references because I didn't think they added anything. You don't need to cite IMDb for every role, just link to it at the bottom in "External links". Similarly, you don't need to link to a film's website just because you have mentioned it. I removed this link: [1] because it doesn't seem to mention him.
• Try to remember to refer to the subject by his surname (you did mostly - just forgot one I think!)
• I removed a couple of categories. Category:African diaspora because this is already covered by Category:British people of Nigerian descent. Also, Category:Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom - this is just for actual ethnic groups, not for people belonging to ethnic minorities.
• Film titles should always be in italics.
• Don't be afraid of red links. They encourage editors to create articles that are currently missing.
• I moved the article to Razaaq Adoti as this seems to be the name he is most often credited as (according to IMDb). Sure enough, a few articles already link to his full name. [2]

Anyway, good work. I hope it is getting easier & making more sense! --BelovedFreak 11:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a good job in finding many sources and citing them. Remember to add ==References== and the reflist template to see them on the page. I went ahead and added it for you -- but you now need to redo the final citations where there is an internal coding error. Good luck. CactusWriter (talk) 23:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the reference 11 entry, it was only missing the two ending brackets -- and that's easy to overlook. I went ahead and added them. CactusWriter (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I see CactusWriter beat me to it. Glad to see you're carrying on creating new articles! --BelovedFreak 20:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Joeseph Gatt.Jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Joeseph Gatt.Jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Joeseph Gatt.Jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joseph Gatt.Jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete this image stating a copyright violation, User:Maxim deleted this image because it was missing source information. Log. --Geniac (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:On the Bench Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Catherine On Wall.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Gatt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable bit part actor. Lacks significant roles in notable productions. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Catherine Pirotta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

PR for Non notable. Lacks notable productions. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:On the Bench Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CATHERINE2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Catherine Pirotta. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Catherine Pirotta.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Catherine Pirotta. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Razadoti.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]