Welcome TJO28!

Hello TJO28, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Solar power in South Africa have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nigerians in South Africa. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 12:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerians in South Africa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Wisolar instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wisolar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wisolar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TJO28! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mutual Trust Microfinance Bank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutual Trust Microfinance Bank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tonye Irims is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonye Irims until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jack Frost (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:T2 Systems has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/t2-systems. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TJO28. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wisolar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TJO28. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wisolar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 17:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siene Allwell-Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siene Allwell-Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Celestina007. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Siene Allwell-Brown have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 14:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TJO28, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not only do I concur with Falcon Kirtaran on this comment they made a while back, I also believe you are engaging in sock puppetry or straight up evading a block. Celestina007 (talk) 12:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wisolar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisolar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kayode Adegbulugbe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Deltaspace42. I noticed that you nominated the article I created, "Kayode Adegbulugbe" for speedy deletion. And I understand that it is because some words may have created the impression that the intention of the article is to promote the individual. I have removed those words that would create that impression, and would sincerely prefer that if there are other words that may indicate that perspective, you should kindly point them out to me or help get them removed.

Kayode is a respectable individual who has made a real impact in various areas. He is one of the few Nigerians I believe should be found on Wikipedia when people search about him. I would appreciate it if you kindly and carefully took a look at the references, and if you have any objections, please draw my attention to them, and I will adjust accordingly.

Thanks. TJO28 (talk) 12:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kayode Adegbulugbe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reading Beans (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Reading Beans, every article on the main space of Wikipedia gets adjusted and updated with more information and sources regularly.

The fact that the article I created needs more sources does not warrant you moving it to drafts. The article is open to the public for corrections and adjustments. I will suggest that instead of moving or removing the article, you make the necessary contribution you can to make it better.

With that being said, I would really appreciate it if you could kindly draw my attention to any issue or error that needs to be addressed before taking any such step, as it would help create opportunities for improvement

Thanks..

TJO28 (talk) 20:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll take a look at the sources once more and take it to AfD if I’m not convinced of it’s notability. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More sources will be added to the article. I would appreciate it if you hold on a little while more updates and sources are added.

It would also be great if, after you've reviewed the sources, you'd draw my attention to what you noticed that does not align with Wikipedia policies and guidelines before you take any steps.

I appreciate you for understanding.

Thanks TJO28 (talk) 21:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TJO28,

I think you misunderstand draftification. It is not a punishment. Articles moved to Draft space are much less likely to be subject to deletion processes like AFD so it allows page creators more time to improve articles and supply adequate sources. But since you moved this article back into main space, it is subject to the evaluation of our NPP (New Page Patrol) who are very careful to only allow articles that meet Wikipedia standards to remain in main space. Draft space is a safe space to work on articles and I encourage you to start articles in that namespace. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kayode Adegbulugbe. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never removed the speedy deletion notice @Liz. Someone else did. You might want to confirm that before making such a conclusion, as it is accusatory.

I did contest the speedy deletion and later saw that the notice had been removed. I would say it is only fair that before drawing conclusions, you should carefully confirm what you believe. Thanks. TJO28 (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Moruf Oseni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have included 3 more sources. Thanks TJO28 (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayode Adegbulugbe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayode Adegbulugbe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoraVoro (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you attacking my articles @BoraVoro? What is your motive? I'm starting to wonder why you are the only one trying to take out my articles. Can you give me tangible reasons for nominating this article for deletion? TJO28 (talk) 23:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you should check the history of an article before making any moves like this on it. Are you aware that the article was nominated for speedy deletion and, shortly after, the notice was removed because it was discovered that Kayode Adegbulugbe is a notable individual who deserves to be on Wikipedia? You should have done some research before proceeding to nominate it. TJO28 (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

share your ideas and comments on the disccusion page please BoraVoro (talk) 07:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't provided any tangible reason for nominating the article for deletion. You can't take such action without any reason. You have no right to do so, @BoraVoro. Please provide a tangible reason for your action, and I can work on it accordingly. TJO28 (talk) 13:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Moruf Oseni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to think you are intentionally attacking my articles. Why would you move my article back to drafts the second time after I had added more sources, and why would you claim that I have a possible conflict of interest pertaining to this article? That would be purely false accusation. Have you taken the time to look up the individual I created the article on? If you feel there are not enough sources, wouldn't it be right for you to add those sources or make necessary improvements based on your observation? Every single article on Wikipedia is up for improvement. I would suggest that if you notice something that needs to be corrected or improved, you should draw my attention to it instead of moving the article and falsely accusing me. TJO28 (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

click on "Submit your draft for review!" button BoraVoro (talk) 07:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kayode Adegbulugbe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayode Adegbulugbe. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This removal of the speedy deletion tag by User:GiantjohnO is obvious sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. User:Celestina007 has already warned you about this twice here at your talk page, and you're on a fast track to getting blocked by an administrator if you don't stop it. Wikishovel (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really confused about what you're saying. I saw a speedy deletion notice, I contested it, and then I saw that it was removed.

When and how did @Celestina007 warn me about this? Where is all of this coming from@Wikishovel? TJO28 (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Celestina007 warned you about sockpuppetry right here on your user talk. See it now?

User:GiantjohnO hasn't edited in two years, yet an hour after I nominated Kayode Adegbulugbe for speedy deletion, they suddenly woke up and removed the db-repost tag, without comment. Wikishovel (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Celestina007 accused me wrongly just the same way you are doing right now. I didn't reply because it made no sense to me. And your reason is not enough proof for such an accusation. There's nothing wrong with asking or investigating first. I dislike the idea of people doing more than necessary because they want to make a good name on Wikipedia. TJO28 (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayode Adegbulugbe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayode Adegbulugbe (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Titus Odiase per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Titus Odiase. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Moruf Oseni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]