Welcome!

Hello, Ptok-Bentoniczny, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ass of bishop, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ass of bishop, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You will still need:

• WP:RELIABLE SOURCES
• WP:VERIFIABILITY
• WP:NOTABILITY

on your side. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, I'm not the person who decides; its up to a consensus my a larger number of people, not just me. And it's up to the admins to make the final decision. If you can ensure that the three above all are good and going, then the page may as well be kept. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ass of bishop, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

fails WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dupa Biskupa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dupa Biskupa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fluttershy !xmcuvg2MH 22:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

02:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

17:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. We try and avoid putting every last bit of trivia into these articles. Per WP:BRD, if you feel strongly about this bit of information, please raise a discussion on the article's talkpage. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 10:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ptok-Bentoniczny, you are way out of line with your behaviour in this article - both with personal attacks and with edit-warring. I happen to agree with you that the material should be included, but if you continue acting like that you will probably get blocked. StAnselm (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He started edit-warring. If he thought it's useless info HE should have gone with this to the article talk. If he's being a dick, I'm not gonna be nice to him either. Ptok-Bentoniczny (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]