Hello, Pcwamingdude, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Damion Stewart. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mattythewhite (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted some of your edits. Some of the edit material is fine however these is a lot that does not improve the original material. Suggest remove 'got' from your vocabulary. Replacing anything with 'got' is usually not a good look. Neils51 (talk) 02:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 1891–92 Football League, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. These edits are unnecessary. Please explain why you consider these edits necessary. Neils51 (talk) 11:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pcwamingdude, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please be aware that, per WP:ENGVAR, we do not prefer one version of English spelling over another unless there is a clear regional linkage e.g. US articles should follow US spelling, Australian articles should use Australian spelling, etc. European articles generally uses British English as that is an official EU language. WP:ENGVAR saves time and editorial disputes. Cheers. Bermicourt (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,

I've reverted your edit because it did more harm than good.

1. You broke a reference by changing the case of "tory": never meddle with a URL, certainly not without checking carefully afterwards that it still works.
2. If an editor chooses to call a reference "beeb", but you'd prefer "Beeb", leave it alone - personally I always use lower-case reference names to save the keystroke of an upper case letter, and reference names are at the choice of the editor.
3. Don't add spaces to categories: they are always referred to with no space (see the way they are referred to in Wikipedia:Categorization, and the use in any featured article such as today's James Wood Bush.
4. The text about adding extra links is from the template {{No more links}}: if you think it should be improved, discuss it at Template talk:No more links.
5. "Several" doesn't convey the same meaning as "a number of" in this context.
6. If the title of a cited article is ungrammatical, leave it alone: the reference should reflect the article. (The plastic bag article seems to be a dead link but we could check for the archived version...)

Thank you for trying to improve the encyclopedia, but please take more care in doing so. PamD 08:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Having seen this edit I've had a look at some of your other recent edits and reverted in some cases, where your changes have done more harm than good to an article. Please take more care. Thanks. (I found the Rory plastic bag ref archived: your change was incorrect.) PamD 08:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]