Hi ParanoidParabola! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 03:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, sorry but this topic seems to me to duplicate the article Cyrillization, which has existed since 2004. I've redirected it to this location; feel free to use your knowledge to expand this article. Contact me if you have any thoughts on this. Blythwood (talk) 04:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cyrillization of English, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 12:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if your experience of contributing to Wikipedia has been a bit confusing. To explain, for a topic like a writing system to be the subject of a Wikipedia article, you need to demonstrate that the system is notable, meaning (basically) that there are articles or books written just about it. A source saying that this system was "devised by Niño Eduardo Evan Fernandez...while he was studying languages like Japanese, German and Russian, he took a liking to the Russian alphabet and decided to adapt it for English" doesn't sound like it would be enough. Wikipedia has a strong policy of removing articles on neologisms and made-up ideas, unless they clearly have traction beyond their inventor. So Bitcoin is notable, because while it's a made-up idea it's one lots of people clearly seem to care way way too much about. Blythwoodcoin or ParanoidParabolacoin wouldn't be. Similarly, an article about Cyrillization of English could potentially be notable (although it would still probably be easier on readers to put it as section of the Cyrillization article in order to consider it synoptically with other languages), but for it not to be deleted it would need to be focused on systems in general use, i.e. how do Russian people convert English words into Cyrillic. Even if this "Cyrillish" system had interesting advantages, you would need to quote an expert saying so, not its inventor. Blythwood (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ParanoidParabola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Space and Missile Tracking System.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ParanoidParabola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sergei Stankevich".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cyrillization of English, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ParanoidParabola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cyrillization of English".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ParanoidParabola, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Anne Gerwig, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Gerwig.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BuySomeApples (talk) 14:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melina Rayna Svanhild Farley-Barratt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert McGee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert McGee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 18:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]