Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--KaragouniS 16:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 21:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces.  06:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moved from Talk:Pelasgians:

While your race was mixed with Asiatic Turkish, Slavs, Jewish our Epiriot Hellenic race remained mostly clear and pure in mountains of Albania with the same language ethnography traditions as in Homeric times. I am sure you are not Helene but one of those other “Greek”, I can see from your hate and your inferiority. “A Greek to prove that is Helens must prove Arvanitic roots” but of course you can not understand that … I do not want to continue this discussion with people like you. You do not need references because you know the history very well , now you better know how to manipulate it. --PIRRO BURRI (talk) 20:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologise please and stop insulting with "racial" terms and attacking the greeks and me personally.My race? A person's value is irrelevant of race.And there is nothing wrong with any of the "races" you mention above.I am very sorry you carry such views about people.You have gone too far.Megistias (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, he has gone too far. He needs to be taught a lesson. I hope an admin sees this. --Tsourkpk (talk) 23:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot believe I'm reading this. Pirro, it is one thing to promote a sense of ethnic or cultural preservation on your part, but to go off and insult other ethnic groups (without evidence mind you) is completely pointless. I may have sympathized with your position since I understand what it's like to be a marginalized user. However, you have crossed the line. I'd understand your mentality if out of frustration you were to insult other users with common terms ("disrespectful," "dishonorable," "stupid," etc.) that even WP:CIVIL would realistically realize could not be entirely avoided in very heated debates. However, to racially discriminate Greeks just because you cannot provide direct evidence to support an Albanian-Pelasgian connection is just plain asinine. Even as a social experiment such behavior should not be condoned.

I really do not care what you or Taulant23 do at this point Pirro. The burden of proof is on your shoulders. Discriminating other users does not help your position and it will definitely not help you acquire the physical evidence you need to support an Albanian-Pelasgian connection.

First, Taulant23 calls me a "Nazi" because of my blog that discusses geopolitics and Greek current events, and now Pirro goes off to call every Greek on Wikipedia a series of things that have nothing to do with Greek identity. This is a complete waste of discussion space. I am not one to support political correctness, but even this is uncalled for.

I guess I have no choice but to recommend that all decent-minded users here cease speaking to any trolls in this discussion space. I think that both Taulant23 and Pirro Burri need to learn some rudimentary manners if both of them wish to be taken seriously here let alone continue contributing to Wikipedia. If this nonsense continues, then I am going directly to an administrator.

I wanted Dbachmann to take care of the "paragraph" supporting the so-called "Albanian-Pelasgian" connection since he seems to be the most neutral user. However, I think Tsourkpk or any other user should just follow through with Dbachmann's critical review of the "paragraph" and get it over with. Deucalionite (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aπό τη σειρά δεν υπήρξαν τέτοια ονόματα σε αυτόν τον χρόνο το όνομα αλλά επειδή εκείνοι οι αρχαίοι Αλβανοί ήταν Pelasgian αυτό αποδεικνύει ότι Αλβανοί προέρχονται από τις ελληνικές φυλές, Illyrian φυλών Pelasgian μας αποκαλούμενη αργότερα, ήταν το substract από όπου Hellen προήλθε από, είναι αυτό σαφές--PIRRO BURRI (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal opinion is irrelevant.Megistias (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

πραγματικά?! τι γίνεται με τις αναφορές Angely, Mayani, Mathias, Vlora, κόλα .. όλες βάσισε στην ελληνική λογοτεχνία --PIRRO BURRI (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments were inappropriate for an article talkpage. Please review WP:TALK. If you continue to disrupt article talkpages or to provoke other editors, you will be blocked from editing for disruption. --dab (𒁳) 18:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

again, please keep personal correspondence on user talkpages. dab (𒁳) 16:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use English for the benefit of all editors on the English-language Wikipedia. Thank you.  Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces.  16:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The illyricum map you want to add is of a Roman province=Illyricum and not of the illyrians.Megistias 13:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If yo look carefully enough this map is in the roman part of articul, why it bothers yo so much ? --PIRRO BURRI 13:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Roman rule should show the first illyricum province, all of them during the ages and of course the tribes before the rule at first.Megistias 13:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pirro, I think you might find this interesting [[1]].

You have been blocked for edit warring on Illyrians. Block duration is 24h. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent edit warring, POV pushing and incivility. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 13:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that i am blocked without justifiable reasons, my edit to Arvanites article are true and sourced that the Arvanites were the majority of population of modern Greece during 19 century and almost certainly still are. --PIRRO BURRI (talk) 14:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By sockpuppeting through 217.24.247.132 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), you have confirmed that you are in fact the banned anon user "Dodona". I am therefore upping your block to indefinite.

Evidence:

• 217.24.247.132 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) [2] repeating User:PIRRO BURRI's edits
• 217.24.240.11 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was anon user "Dodona" in August ([3])
• Dodona is banned ([4])
• "PIRRO BURRI" appeared at the Arvanites article, making similar edits to "Dodona", right after Dodona was banned and several other socks of his were blocked.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, your are punishing me for my edit to Arvanites …you just can prove me that I am not right and not to stop me from protecting my patriots in Greece and of course to give an alternative view from all of you. I admit that I have been persistent but instead of stopping me forever we can discuss your view and alternatives. In that point I will call you to reconsider your decision because I have not committed any vandalism so fare, I am sorry if my views have hurt some editors here in wikipedia but be certain that my intention are positive. I am a patriot and love my country and our glorious race --PIRRO BURRI (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]