Hello there. This is the first time I've asked, so I'll get straight to the point:

About a year ago, a certain Wikipedian thought he could motivate people to build a knowledge base such as Wikipedia but about twice as fast by incorporating a per-author empowerment strategy. His idea was to mirror Wikipedia and allows anyone to monetize her article and reap 100% revenue thereof.

So, around this time last year this project was up. At the outset, there were at least two features that distinguished Wikiafripedia from Wikipedia, viz: dedicated namespaces for scholars original research and his empowerment strategy. But there were many similarities, such as the website software, editorial principle, governing structure, mission and vision.

However, his project has since been struggling as there are very few contributes to it because, unlike Wikipedia this dude didn't start Wikiafripedia at the beginning of the millennia and also lacked the capacity to advertise it or reach out to a huge number of potential editors like you. Yet he hasn't given up.

He likes Wikipedia but he thinks if people were empowered/motivated/encouraged financially they could solved the current shortage of quality content from third-war regions like South-East Asia or Africa in less time since empowered-people would more likely want to contribute more. It's also Important to motivate people because, the kind of writing required for these kind of projects takes people's time and for most people especially those in these regions, time is penny. To this light, we need your support.

Today, we need you to create an article to grow the knowledge base of Wikiafripedia. 90% of our readers don't write; they simply look the other way. You may not be our reader but we need you because you believe knowledge should be made free and accessible. But if you are an exceptional reader who have already written, we sincerely thank you.

If everyone reading this write at least an article, we could augment the knowledge based of the world that will empower many people financially yet freely accessible to anyone and keep Wikiafripedia thriving for years. A bit of your time is all we need, it's a little awkward for us to ask you this Today, as we are sure you are busy and we don't mean to interrupt you.

However, we encourage you to make a contribution today towards a win-win end of simultaneously growing Wikiafripedia encyclopedia and at the same time empowering yourself passively.

People think we will regret making Wikiafripedia a non-profit and sharing revenue with authors. But Wikiafripedia is a place to encourage learning, not a place to tax people. It unites all of us who love knowledge: contributors, readers, the donors and advertisers who keep us thriving. Show the world that all the knowledge and experience it afforded you to live your life matters by adding also your light to it in the form of a well written-neutral-article in a subject area that you have knowledge and access to the information of, so that anyone may benefit from your knowledge.

We know most people will want to ignore this message, and that it can be tricky to make a contribution to even a course you believed in without the right resources, as one cannot give what she does not have. That's why we are giving you all 100% advertising revenue from your content.

There will be no deduction in your earnings, for each content you authored (100%) and this terms is only subject to review every ten years since 2019. We wouldn't even know how much you're earning from your preferred advertisers for the Wikiafripedia content you authored as that will only be known to you, we can only guess if we look at the performance of the content; our work is to help implement your ads codes securely. Your earnings progress will largely depends on the number of contents you've created (the more the better) and the level of publicity you've given to each of them, as we enforced strict contents quality and SEO globally.

Notwithstanding... We know that people might still ignore this message, and that it can be tricky to make time to contribute what you know for the benefits of others. But our hope is that, if you can write/edit articles for free on Wikipedia, why not with an incentive on Wikiafripedia? I hope you will think about how valuable it is to have access to a source of free, open knowledge that would Keep giving you money instead of asking. This is the first feature that distinguished Wikiafripedia from other encyclopedias.

If Wikiafripedia have provided you valued worth of knowledge/information/reflection this year, please take time out of your busy schedule to contribute to it growth. It is NOT money we ask but that you contribute your knowledge or technical expertise to help make free from copyright educational resources available and accessible to all in abundance. Imagine a world where everyone can freely share in the sum of all knowledge? That's our mission, our vision statement.

In a nutshell:
At Wikiafripedia, you will be able to monetize contents you've created for an undeductable (100%) revenue to you and you alone. What's your thoughts about that?

Please speak your mind.

Cheers

Useful link:

• https://wikiafripedia.org/wiki/Wikiafripedia:Revenue_sharing (Wikiafripedia revenue scheme)
• https://wikiafripedia.org/wiki/Wamf:Mission (Wikiafrimedia mission)
• https://wikiafripedia.org/wiki/Wamf:Vision (Wikiafrimedia vision)

Hi Officialtollu, I accedentally rollbacked your edits on the above page without leaving an edit summary. The edits were undone as changing a header like this breaks MOS:HEADER, where headers such as "Prize fund" should be in sentence case. If you have further questions, drop me a message. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 13:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Officialtollu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Em-mustapha talk 13:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Officialtollu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamil Muhammed Abubakar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]