Is Chidananda S Naik notable? Almost every single other short film that won did not have an article for the short film or the director per Cinéfondation. I am not sure if the short film warrants an article because all of the source say "Sunflowers Were the First Ones to Know wins La Cinef Award". DareshMohan (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan, I am not sure I would consider him notable so far, the article has 2 "primary" sources (interviews) and 2 sources about an award for his directorial debut short shot in 4 days during his 1-year cinema course....; there's also https://variety.com/2024/film/global/cannes-la-cinef-award-chidananda-s-naik-1236014626/ . Notable as director of a short that has received an award? Not sure the coverage about the said film receiving that award is significant and not sure it's enough to warrant a page about him, no. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to a redirect. I noticed that not many editors are not brave enough to put articles through deletion since it is frowned upon. @Jeraxmoira: do you know that long interviews are not independent sources? DareshMohan (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks to your nice research in this AfD (and other AfDs in general). I feel bad when other editors lash out of you because you are edits are genuine, hope you don't take it personally. DareshMohan (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DUDE DO NOT SPOIL THE DESPICABLE ME 4 MOVIE. I GET IT WAS RELEASED IN YOUR COUNTRY BUT THAT DOES NOT GIVE YOU AN EXCUSE TO SPOIL IT 1 F*CKING MONTH BEFORE IT RELEASES HiGuys69420 (talk) 22:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please educate yourself, dude.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 06:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a move discussion at Talk:Public Sector Undertakings in India which is receiving less participation and is likely to be closed without a clear consensus. I would greatly appreciate if you could spare some time and leave your valuable opinion. Thank you. Have a great day. 2409:4073:104:92C2:9939:2182:D47D:646F (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude. I know you are trying to put the plot there but please be patient dude. Tell you what, you can put the plot but do it TWO WEEKS before the film comes out okay. This is WAY TOO EARLY and you are making a lot of people angry. HiGuys69420 (talk) 18:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, dude, educate yourself.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, i know about the "no template" thing, i'm just not entirely sure ani notices don't take priority over it, so sorry for that cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, oh don't worry @Cogsan:, and on the contrary, many thanks. It's more about warning templates with no context and boilerplate explanations that I put this notice (the spirit in which it is done is all that matters), but double thanks for your courtesy and polite note. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi so i am one of users who is removing your edits on despicable me 4 the reson i am doing so is beacse i am not sure if you know but your plot section is unfinshed and also as other peple have staed there are peple who dont want the movie spolied for them let me provide you with a little advice you should be more considerint of others because its not just your opion that matters. with that said the movie littery comes out in 2 days in tyhe us so do me and the rest of wikipedia a favor and stop being a karen and be more considerint of others. Loidforger555 (talk) 22:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mushy Yank! I just wanted to check - your recent edit removed the paid tag on Prateek Sharma. Was there a reason this was removed? - Bilby (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bilby. Yes, there was. 2 sections are still unsourced but I didn't see anything overtly promotional or non-neutral. Except maybe one sentence. Hence the new tag. Mostly, the paid-contribution tag was there since 2020 and the page hasn't been edited by potential paid accounts since 2021, as far as I can see. I’ll remove a few things, feel free to remove or source more. Thanks.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. I just wanted to ensure it wasn't an accident. If you feel it should be removed it is fine with me. - Bilby (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Curious why you removed @Rosguill's notability tag on Nenjathai Killadhe (2014 TV series) without discussing? This page is at AfD for the very reason that its notability is questionable, so it seems premature to remove the tag. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, because you took it to Afd and that notabilty is precisely discussed there, so that the tag is now redundant. No opinion (yet) on whether it is notable or not myself. (My edit summary should have been: Afd but, as often, with my es, it was autocorrected erroneously)-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I generally leave the maintenance tags on until conclusion of the discussion (particularly in case of a N/C outcome) but your approach makes sense once explained. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basically the title. Do you know any alternatives to editing Wikipedia? I don't want it to be a hinderance to my real life (i.e. I would rather finish an edit than complete a useful task) in the long term but I genuinely enjoy editing but I would want to take a break and return when I am "successful". I can't spend as much time on YouTube shorts or social media and have not gotten into video games. I like to contribute to the online community (i.e. edit google maps), but I know that such things aren't normal as most people don't edit Wikipedia. DareshMohan (talk) 06:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DareshMohan. Good and fair question. You are right: a small screen is not the best in life. And it can cause great trouble. The closest (but healthy) thing to editing an online encyclopaedia would be read and study (paper encyclopaedias are great), but if you have a job and working hours allow, cinema theaters, monuments, museums, nature, and sports! Drop YT and RS. If you worry it's a hinderance, it probably means you are right and need to go out. I would stop editing for a month and just would not even use Wikipedia (!) and force myself to paper ressources when I need them, if you have easy access to a library. Yeah, that's where I (would) go first, if I had time (and actually, that's what I do): a real library. It's a joyful and meditative place and it has real people (hopefully) reading in it. And if you miss Wikipedia (it will miss you but it can cope with it) send (upload) a picture! And if you like to write and film, you can start reviewing films for yourself. Do it on a notebook so that you won't be tempted to open this Pandora box. Addictions are not good and life is bigger than a screen. People managed living without the Internet! Best,-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DareshMohan, try going to a retreat. Or a spiritual travel. If mobile phones were not so essential to our jobs and personal life, I'd have destroyed mine long ago. Or given it away. But I'm also getting increasingly less time on Wiki due to my work timings. I want to quit Wiki when there is someone as skilled and committed as us. Or when vandalism patrolling improves. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]