It is suspected or confirmed that this user has used one or more sock puppets for abuse, libel, or ban evasion. See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets. The use of abusive sock puppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sock puppets to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset and may further lengthen it.
Hello Martin181! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I think it's very important for you to browse through some of the links below so as to become familiar with how Wikipedia works. If you need any help you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and another Wikipedian will show up shortly. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you're already loving Wikipedia and plan on becoming a Wikipedian you might consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor, just paste {{Adoptme}} into your userpage and you will gladly be adopted! You might also consider joining a WikiProject so as to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! -- The Hybrid 10:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Dave Bautista, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. do not add un verifiable trivia and do not remove content like is signature moves without explanation or reason... also logging in under two different names is not away to get around this --- Paulley
Why do you continue to make the same edits with out reasoning when they are reverted and explained to be wrong. If you continue on like this without explaining your action you will be stopped from editing --- Paulley 16:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop.... is there any reason for your edits i have given you plenty of chance to reply or at least explain your edits yet you do not!!!!---Paulley 22:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You can boast about your Brock Lesnar knowledge all you want, I couldn't care less. However, this does not change the fact that your edits are bad. Unsourced images re not allowed; you add these. You also remove referenced information and tags without fixing the problems, then there's the changes which go against the MOS, the poor use of English, grammar etc. etc. etc. Continue to vandalise and you'll be blocked again. SteveLamacq43 15:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't add abuse to my talk page. If you looked at the history of the article, you'll notice that two other people have reverted your vandalism since I last did. I notice you've been blocked again so maybe you've got the message. SteveLamacq43 14:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked for a 3 revert rule violation on Brock Lesnar. Usually the second offense is 48 hours but I made it 72 since it was in a very short time after your first block. Please stop. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 12:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No matter how much you know about Lesner, I would suggest trying to work it out with other users. Revert warring isn't the way to go. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I should have to justify myself to a proven vandal, but I reverted your latest because it was again a bad edit. You blanked a section, you removed the references tag, you added a picture with no rationale, you changed decent sentences for poorly spelled and written others including unnecessary and perhaps untrue information.SteveLamacq43 13:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
that shows it you know nothing about lesnar beacuse i damm sure have seen lesnars matches with bubba ray dudley ric flair etc his matches with rvd for the intercontinental championship john cena at backlash 2003 big show in a stretcher match at judgment day and you say its not true? and i added a great picture of the f-5 i corrected the move sets he used to do a sitout death valley driver thats how he can up with the f-5 i even saw it on confidential and in a match against batista in ovw and if you look at his matches with jeff at backlash and matt on raw and shawn stasiak you see that the spinning kneeling powerbomb was used to win by knock out on those matches and i dont want to go on you can order brock tapes download search read for those informations i write or just dont do anything your noob.
.martin181 22:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As you won't stop, I'm going to warn you every time you vandalise the article.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SteveLamacq43 22:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SteveLamacq43 00:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
Image copyright problem with Image:Austin-Lesnar-Stunner.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Austin-Lesnar-Stunner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Orphaned fair use image (Image:PlanetstasiakF5.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:PlanetstasiakF5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ BigrTex 21:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These images have been similarly tagged for the same reasons:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ShawnF5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 21:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
please read the hidden text warnings before editting.. if you read you will see that the names "Hog Log" and "Hog Lock" are names from video games and other sources, the name of the move is just Showstopper. As for the chokeslam that move was never named except in video games where it was called the Showstopper. However, we do not list video game names only officle names are used (ones that appear on WWE profiles in the case of WWE wrestlers) --- Paulley
If you violate 3RR again, you are likely to be blocked for at least 1 week from the site. Stop. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
i suggest you stop waisting your time on that page beacuse i wont.
You have been blocked for your 4th 3RR violation in the last 2 1/2 weeks on Brock Lesnar. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 12:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
oh well i guess its time to behave then.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
ive decided to change around here and if someone thinks im vandalising im gonna accept it and stop doing what some user consideres vandalise therefore im asking for another chance and if i get blocked again for any reason then i accept it to be permament not just my username but my ip adress aswell im going to change just asking for another chance whatever any user thinks im doing wrong im stoping doing that and i will respect other users.
Decline reason:
You've already had plenty of chances, come back after the block and avoid edit warring and there shouldn't be a problem. --pgk 20:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
just give me a chance now the only reason was beacuse some user didnt like my edits on Brock Lesnar im just asking for one more chance right know and if i do something wrong again then block me directly permamently instead of warning.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
just give me a chance now the only reason was beacuse some user didnt like my edits on the Brock Lesnar page im just asking for one more chance right know and if i do something wrong again then block me directly permamently instead of warning. I think its fair to just block someone like that when i did alot writing for Brock Lesnar then someone who really dosent know much thinks im vandalising beacuse he wants the references to be in another way thats unfair
Decline reason:
See unblock review above. Your talk page is now also protected to preclude further requests. -- Sandstein 21:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You were caught using a sockpuppet to bypass the legitimate block placed on this account. Your sockpuppet account has been blocked indefinitely and your block has been extended to one month. Any further violations of WP:SOCK may result in a permanent ban from editing. --Yamla 17:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And just for the record, he has admitted using sockpuppets, including this account. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user has continued to waste our time with unblock requests. It is recommended that this user not be unblocked for at least a year. That is, a year of good behaviour. --Yamla 19:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you're already loving Wikipedia and plan on becoming a Wikipedian you might consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor, just paste {{Adoptme}} into your userpage and you will gladly be adopted! You might also consider joining a WikiProject so as to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! -- The Hybrid 10:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
