Do you think that the famous Americans pictures with the individual pictures or the mosaic pictures are the best? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for your good work in WIkiProject Comics. A lot of your edits that I've seen have been smart, subtle corrections that show a really sharp eye. Glad to be working with you, man! --Tenebrae (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Since you're a member of WP:Rock, would you be interested in commenting or reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? It's received one editor's comments but no follow-up yet, so anything would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was there anything from this drastic cut worth keeping in the lead? 50.141.204.194 (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I understand that we cannot put every single item as a power of the characters; but according to who we can tell is relevant or not? Maybe for an animation fan the 'Genius-level intellect' is not relevant or is false, but for a comic book fan is very relevant.
I am a comic books reader and, believe me, Bane has a 'Genius-level intellect' and is very relevant for the comic books; read Batman: Knightfall and you will be agree with me...
Thanks Arussom (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Your explanation is very accurate and precise... and let me very clear. Now I understand the goal... and I share it :)

Thanks! Arussom (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this image be better suited at The New 52#Portrayal of female characters since the section mentions this specific issue?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, TriiipleThreat, I think that image would be a better fit.

I appreciate the kind words. I've been seeing you around WikiProject:Comics a lot lately, and I like your work. And I'm glad to see you know TriiipleThreat, who in my humble opinion is one of the best editors the project has. Great to collaborate with you! --Tenebrae (talk) 16:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	I see you around a lot and you're pretty good. Take this. :) DangerousJXD (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Doc. I'm just hoping I can persuade you that three stacked images is — from an objective, standard graphic-design perspective — not good design. Staggering images is standard practice. What do you say? --Tenebrae (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenebrae: I completely agree with you. I actually prefer using the left side for images in these situations, as staggering images to the right is quite unaesthetic. I very recently put the image to the left but noticed BaronBifford moved it back to the right. I assumed I was alone in wanting to put the image to the left. Glad we're in agreement. DrRNC (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I apologize ... what with all the back and forth, I thought you had moved it to the right. All good, then. Let's keep an eye on the alignment. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Things just got ugly with BaronBifford. Please see this edit and my followup. It's incomprehensible to me why he would snap that way, and I've seen these kinds of exchanges escalate without responsible third party. Hoping you can be that.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenebrae: I just saw your message; I've been very busy lately. He's exhibiting a short temper, which we've seen before. Even with his cooperation in the Superman article, it's evident that he's quick to violate Wikipedia rules and even those of common courtesy. You've been receptive to his ideas, but he still is prone to disregarding the opinions of others and the overall consensus on any given topic. I think you're bound to run into problems working with him, but if something comes up where consensus is needed, feel free to let me know. I have many things going on right now so I apologize if I cannot respond in a timely many. DrRNC (talk) 20:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep contributing to the article on comics otherwise it will not be improved. Bod (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reference every sentence. However when multiple sentence in a row are supported by the same ref I hide all but the last one. Are you asking here [1] for them all to be visible? I know other editors complain when they are all visible. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Thanks for getting back to me. The sentence about bronchiectasis causing digital clubbing was a stand alone sentence, and it did not look as though the reference at the end of the lead paragraph was in regards to that sentence also. I went ahead and combined the sentences to avoid any confusion. DrRC (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, @Darkknight2149 directed me to you, saying that you might have something to say on a matter of changing Batman's current infobox image from Lee's to Ross'. The subject is the current discussion on the Talk:Batman page.Teridax122 (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a dispute at Talk:Spider-Man and the X-Men over whether a redlink editor's edits violate WikiProject Comics guidelines as fancruft and issue-by-issue synopses. A comparison of two versions is here. I am writing to some longtime Project editors individually, since Portal talk:Comics appears to have very little traffic and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Notice board has had no postings in years. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Batman#"Genius intellect". ChamithN (talk) 02:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That sarcastic edit summary made me chuckle . -- ChamithN (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a neutral notice of a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Comics#Request for Comment: Quotes and italics. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me change the photo of Wally West to the recent rebirth costume? Gokuwarrior (talk) 16:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Batman for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DarkKnight2149 19:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are aware, or care, but the word "affluent" has been re-inserted in the West Hills article again, after you removed it.

The use of this word became an issue on the Sherman Oaks page. I thought you might be interested. The word was finally removed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sherman_Oaks,_Los_Angeles#Affluence and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:BeenAroundAWhile#Edit-warring_on_articles_about_districts_of_Los_Angeles Phatblackmama (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to take part at the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker (character). DarkKnight2149 22:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The word "affluent" keeps getting reinserted into the West Hills.. DrRC, This has now turned into an edit war, with 4 reverts by one user.~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:CD8F:C70:ECB8:C663:419:924C (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Doc. It's always good to see your signature on an edit; you've a fellow veteran and I've always appreciated all your good and hard work. I did want to come by and let you know I re-added Detective Comics #27 to Bob Kane since there was no explanation for its deletion, and more importantly, because no consensus had been reached for it — as had been, for example, with File:Civilians bodies in Rada'a.jpg right below it. I'm wondering if it might not be good to let the discussion continue, as it's only been two days and I, for one, hadn't been aware of it. Thank you for understanding. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've reinserted an edit at the Joker article by stating "This should certainly be in the lead" without addressing any of the issues raised when it was removed. I'm sure you have good reasons for ignoring those concerns so please relate them to me here. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 18:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Darkwarriorblake. I'm glad you reached out to me. I believe the character's relation to Gotham City is a vital part of his portrayal in comic books. We can always make the argument that any given character leaves their main city and goes elsewhere for whatever reason. It's DC Comics after all; it's not uncommon for earthly characters to even go to outer space for a given storyline. If we buy into that argument, we can negate Batman's relation to Gotham, Superman's relation to Metropolis, and in the same vein as the Joker - Lex Luthor's relation to Metropolis. There's even a show called Gotham reminding us how integral the city is to Batman's main enemies. The Joker, along with Penguin and Two-Face, are depicted as being Gotham City criminals with ties to the Gotham criminal underworld. In mass media, the character has always been depicted as being a Gotham City criminal. I actually found it shocking that the city isn't mentioned anywhere in the lead. I hope you'll see my point in this regard, and it's always a pleasure working with you. DrRC (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although, Darkwarriorblake, I must say that I believe using the phrase "Gotham City criminal mastermind" may be better. It takes away any potential notion that he is always in Gotham, but perhaps it does not read as well. DrRC (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I get what you are saying, but I don't think of the Joker as a Gotham City criminal. Someone like the Penguin will operate their and is defined by it much like Luthor because of his ties to LexCorp, and Batman and Superman are defined by their cities because that is where they are based and it is a part of their character, whereas the Joker doesn't care about Gotham, he just cares about Batman, transplant him to a different city and it doesn't alter his character as long as Batman is there, transplant Batman to Metropolis and it changes him. But my main issue was the placement of the wording, it reads weird and defines him by a relation to Gotham City which I don't think is that big a deal compared to his relationship to Batman. If anything he is more identified by Arkham Asylum not Gotham City, the Asylum is for all intents and purposes, his home, his base, and a major trait of his character since the 70s. I am going to re-read the lead and look for somewhere it can be introduced more naturally if you still think it should be there.Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 18:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's a line in the third paragraph that reads, "Although the Joker sometimes works with other supervillains such as the Penguin and Two-Face, and groups like..." I think Gotham City fits well there, in which the line can read, ""Although the Joker sometimes works with other Gotham City supervillains such as..." What do you think, Darkwarriorblake? DrRC (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the very same thing, great minds. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 93. I noticed that you recently removed content from Batgirl without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 9³ 17:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 13:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Aquaman Vol 8 16 Variant.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has a *lot* of non-free media. This is not adding anything.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added caption information and reversed your deletion of the cover image from Catwoman Inheritance. Your comment on the deletion was "no rationale for this being here." Pretty terse (I'd say inadequate) for a unilateral deletion, and somewhat inaccurate since there was text in the body describing the unusual out-of-costume narrative arc that is illustrated by the image. Nevertheless I also augmented the image caption to clarify the relationship between image and text, to address your concerns. If you continue to feel additional information or clarity are needed, please explain here rather than starting a chain of reversions. The image was added with considered intention, so I'd appreciate corresponding courtesy in your editorial approach. --GDswamp (talk) 19:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you share your opinion, however, the reason I changed the image is because I felt that the composition the current one gives a sense that we would see Chill in young Bruce's point of perspective when he stare at him.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 03:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, while Robert Pattinson is yet to play the Caped Crusader, it is indeed confirmed he was cast. To have a more complete article for Batman, it'd be helpful to update the "Film" subsection in Other Media to indicate that. I'm a new user so I don't have access to edit that page. Please update and thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidGalán123 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not editing anymore, but I wanted to say a quick thank-you for uploading this image, which made me aware of the story. James26 (talk) 19:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I'm enjoying the story. I've been thinking about tidying up the Ivy article in a few places, though it seems to be in nice shape overall. James26 (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have a great rest of your holiday season! If you do not, then you should know that I have acquired a very particular set of skills on my time on Wikipedia. Skills that make me a nightmare for people who do not enjoy themselves. If you do not have a great time this year, I will find you... And I will block you.

But seriously, happy holidays. DarkKnight2149 22:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Justice League.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BatmanRoguesGallery.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catwoman art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Batgirl Vol 4 35.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Black Manta Aquaman Vol 8 15.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bane Batman Vol 3 18.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 06:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Huntress DC Comics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Gordon Batgirl Vol 5 4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Bruce Wayne Batcave Batman vol 3 2.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:LexCorp Tower.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]