I'm having trouble identifying the reason for the introduction of this category; as it is identical in most respects to Category:Christopher Wren churches in London - except for the exceptions noted in that category. I think such an additional category is likely to be listed at categories for discussion shortly, and likely removed. It is also unclear from the category name as to whether these are 'surviving Wren churches in the City of London'; or 'surviving Wren churches in Greater London'. Thanks Kbthompson (talk) 16:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since there will be no more made by Wren; perhaps you could consider a more useful expenditure of your time in creating such a list - with a name like List of Christopher Wren Churches in London. Such a list could be sub-divided by City of London (the majority); other locations (few exceptions); and each church could be listed by construction date - demolition (if appropriate). An example of a list like that is List of churches destroyed in the Great Fire of London and not rebuilt. I am worried that you're doing an enormous amount of work that may be quickly undone - I have seen many of these things go to CFD and the result be 'listify'. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, lists are to be preferred for categories which are 'immutable' - ie not subject to change. In particular, there are few differences between the two categories - which is why I thought I'd ask you about it. cheers Kbthompson (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That seems fine; I'm sure references can eventually be found to support the information in the list. I've no time now; but I might do some formatting (tabulate, etc) when I do have some. I really think that is quite useful; well done. Congratulations on your first article for wikipedia! Kbthompson (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surviving Christopher Wren London churches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joedkins. You have new messages at Talk:Lace_machine.
Message added 17:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Princess lace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aalst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jo

Could you please briefly introduce yourself in your user page? Then I would no longer be confronted with a red link when I "talk" to you on other pages. Now I'm never sure I misspelled your user name. Also you don't have to repeat your introduction when you are addressing others. Jo Pol (talk) 06:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joedkins. You have new messages at Talk:Battenberg_lace.
Message added 06:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Joedkins. You have new messages at Talk:Lille lace.
Message added 06:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Joedkins. You have new messages at Talk:Bayeux lace.
Message added 06:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Joedkins. You have new messages at Talk:Beveren lace.
Message added 06:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Joedkins, thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of point ground. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 15:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobbin lace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ground. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joedkins. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joedkins. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joedkins. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]