Trichome

Discretionary sanctions alerts

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Isi96. Thank you for your work on Alyla Browne. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article about Alyla Browne

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Isi96. Thank you for your work on Rukshan Fernando. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haaretz

[edit]

Re [1] I was going to give you an argument, but then I realized you're right! The Haaretz byline was confusing. My bad. Coretheapple (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Responses section on 2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally

[edit]

Hello, Isi96. Please discuss your decision to add responses here on the talk page for the 2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally. It is currently being debated, as it will likely become outdated very quickly, and turn into a pain to edit later if we add reactions from every politician. Ornov Ganguly (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was restoring reactions that were previously removed, but sure, I'll participate. Thanks for notifying me. Isi96 (talk) 00:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

[edit]

Reminder that it is a violation of Wikipedia TOS to engage in paid for editing or content manipulation. DanMan3395 (talk) 20:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DanMan3395 I don't appreciate the insinuation that I'm reverting your disruptive edits because I'm paid to do so. Isi96 (talk) 23:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
The content you are placing on that page violate the neutral point of view policy and use non-academic quality sources. You cannot source highly political content with opinion bases media outlet pages. You are clearly attempting to promote a biased view on this page, regardless of your personal motivation. DanMan3395 (talk) 16:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DanMan3395 you are incorrect and casting aspersions. Please review WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:YESPOV EvergreenFir (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the above actions, I can post any absurdity i want, so long as I can cite a major news outlet publishing the same opinion. DanMan3395 (talk) 01:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply