This is your only warning; if you remove or blank sourced material from Wikipedia again, as you did at Ashcroft Technology Academy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Black Kite (talk) 14:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ashcroft Technology Academy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That section isn't going to be removed. The rest of the article is positive about the Academy, but that criticism is (a) completely valid (b) reliably sourced to the UK's biggest education magazine, and (c) was very big news at the time, indeed probably the most coverage that ATA has had. Please stop removing it, as the inevitable results are going to be (a) you will be blocked indefinitely, and/or (b) the article will be locked. Thank you, Black Kite (talk) 18:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Insaaf2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a School page with information to parents and future students and not a political forum, the abusive user can create a new page detailing staff issues.This is not the appropriate forum and we want the parents and future styudents to have clear useful information to help them decide if this school is for them, political wranglings do not belong on this page.

Decline reason:

This is a wikipedia page about a school; it is not a school page. This is an encyclopedia, not a prospectus. If the section in question is incorrect, then demonstrate the inaccuracy. Until you do so, it stays. Any further similar editing on your part after your short block expires will lead to a longer block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 08:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(ec) To repeat what Anthony Bradbury says: I believe you're rather mistaken about the purpose of Wikipedia: it's an encyclopedia and not a promotional site. Articles are not here to find "useful information to help them decide if this school is for them". Encyclopedia articles are supposed to document places where the subject has been in mainstream newspapers/TV. Your statement makes me fear that you are related to the school in some fashion, which would also not be permitted (✉→BWilkins←✎) 08:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 16:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]