Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Plaman Mapu, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn Battle of plaman mapu was resulted Indonesian effort to storm and make plaman mapu base get heavy damage and maybe resulted Tactical Victory for Indonesia Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 08:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sunda Straits Crisis, you may be blocked from editing. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn the Sunda Strait Crisis was resulted stalemate or indecisive cuz british ship was trapped on sunda strait and both of them didn't want to attack the sunda strait crisis many malayan account who want to change result to british victory Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 08:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one that changed it from "British victory" to "Stalemate". Do you have sources to prove that? As you are the one changing the material the onus is on you to provide the proof. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn The debate over who came out the best from the Crisis, Britain or Indonesia, continues on into the present, and though many historians depict a British advantage (admittedly, these historians are British and American) there is a credible case for the success of both sides.Subritzky 2000, p. 121. Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your quotation, there is nothing in the quote that implied that the result is "stalemate". "Credible case for the success of both sides" aren't necessarily stalemates. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn

battle of Long Jawai was Indonesian Tactical Victory cuz they make Gurkha Retired from the post Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From the article: This defence was remarkably effective, and eventually the barrage of Indonesian rocket fire halted and the few remaining British soldiers rose from their hideouts and began to clear the perimeter. Soon afterwards, Gurkha soldiers and medical staff arrived at the base by helicopter, leaving the soldiers behind to secure the area and airlifting the wounded to a nearby hospital. By this point, however, Indonesian forces had withdrawn, effectively ending the battle From that excerpt it is obvious that Indonesian military is defeated and the British are victorious.

On the article as well: "Never again was such a powerful and concentrated cross-border attack attempted by the Indonesian Army." and also "Defeat in what was intended to be a highly publicised victory ... they now saw to be the destructive force of Sukarno and the Communist Party." showed that this battle ended in a defeat for Indonesian forces. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn

i admited that battle of plaman mapu was British Victory but Indonesian was already destroyed plaman mapu base

sources:

https://historia.id/militer/articles/baret-merah-bikin-inggris-berdarah-darah-P0KNM/page/1 Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 09:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific? Could you point out where it is stated that "the bases were destroyed". Losing a single mortar does not mean the base is destroyed. The title of the article showed the bias of the article that it seems like the English are bloodied so much, while in truth Indonesian forces lost more with at least 30 dead (the British lost 2). ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn "Colonel Sarwo Edhie knew him well, because he was the one who gave him an extraordinary promotion, to Sergeant Major on the West Kalimantan border, thanks to his success in destroying the British stronghold in Mapu, Sarawak," wrote Aristides Katoppo and his friends in Mengengkapu Kabut Halim 1965.

well i was missunderstanding reading the article Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Java War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Javanese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gilberatalessandro054! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Combat operations in 1963 during the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel hi im glad you leaving this message, i was editing the article to add battle's that Indonesian People need im also not vandalism cause i was read the indonesian veteran book,indonesian history article like Historia, and Kopassus book.

I hope we can editing the konfrontasi with many battle and adding sources that was my message Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 11:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are still marking all of your major edits to Java War, like this one, as minor. Please stop. Wikishovel (talk) 04:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel everybody was vandals the page like remove it and i already said it was inspirated by maratha portuguese war Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 05:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if you think your edit was right. Don't mark a major edit as minor. Wikishovel (talk) 05:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel ok Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 05:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You say "OK", but you're still doing it: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Please stop. Wikishovel (talk) 10:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel but why i should stop it i have the sources sir Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if you have the sources. Don't mark a major edit as minor. If you don't understand this, then please read Help:Minor edit to learn what a minor edit is on Wikipedia. Wikishovel (talk) 10:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JarrahTree 14:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree who's violate i add those battles cuz inspirated by maratha portuguese war Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 01:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Pattimura has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pattimura, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 08:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel hey bro i just add some battles in Pattimura and i was involved the rebels victory and dutch victory Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 08:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pattimura. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 08:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel dear sir i believe im right cuz i read the article sir but many people didn't accept that Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 08:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if you believe you are right. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Wikishovel (talk) 08:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel ok sir but i didn't believe that im right too Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 08:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Pattimura) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 13:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Further instances of copyvio will result in an indefinite block. Please pay attention to why you are being reverted, your first instinct should not be to just revert back. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees for the first i don't do violation i just added some battles Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 13:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gilberatalessandro054 The text you added in these series of edits was identical to this source you were citing, https://web.archive.org/web/20230109235213/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35468348.pdf . Text added to Wikipedia needs to be written in your own words, you can't copy from sources. User:Moneytrees/Copyright blocks has some advice on appealing this block. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 23:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees ok im sorry about copying the text im apologize what i did Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 01:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Sultanate of Siak Sri Indrapura has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to First Aceh Expedition has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Combat operations in 1964 during the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GreenLipstickLesbian wait what i didn't violated😹🥸 Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 04:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 11:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This essay could be right for you: WP:PBAGDSWCBY Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Padri War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch, Chief and Batavia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot wait what the Padri War divided to two war in 1801-1825 Padri Ulama Win it but after the dutch was defeated diponegoro in 1830 so they comeback and declare war against padri 1831-1837 the result is dutch win and the capture of imam bonjol Gilberatalessandro054 (talk) 01:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits (i.e. edit-warring across multiple articles after many warnings).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 12:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]