Hello Funnyfarmofdoom. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lin Chen (playwright), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The person won a notable award, the Cultural Medallion, passing A7 . Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 06:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Congrats on passing 6000 edits! Cynival^{Thou Shalt Talk to Me} 02:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello Funnyfarmofdoom,

This is about the -ICU Dining Hall- article. I am new at creating wikipedia articles, and I understand you have a job to do, but I am creating a wikipedia of one of my University's biggest assets. I've been asked to create one from the administration, and Im not particularly enthusiastic about this task, and having this article repeatedly changed is not helping. I can guarentee you that its not promotional, and it will be completed before jan 12th, which is my deadline. Please let it live

Thank you, Sicksbp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sicksbp (talk • contribs) 08:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

I'd suggest pointing the administration to our conflict of interest guidelines and the FAQ for organizations to begin with. --slakr^\ talk / 08:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Funnyfarmofdoom is a SMART GENIUS!    Thorncrag  02:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

So If my name is LADY GAGA I must obviously be Lady Gaga. Get of your high horse, don't be an internet bully there are better things you can be doing. Thank you. I'll make a new account and add more articles that should be on wiki. Smart one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Botcrawl (talk • contribs) 04:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

No, it would be obvious that you had an agenda to lady gaga, and I would tag your edits as having a conflict of interest. And before you start creating more accounts, I suggest you read Our policy on sock puppets Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 04:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

You are not connecting the dots. I like the name Botcrawl. You are not presenting any evidence beyond reasonable doubt. I'm speaking contrary you're on your upaid internet high horse, please for the same love of God get off of it. You honestly could be doing much more valuable things than destroying a websites integrity. Thank you, If you want to talk on the phone go ahead (480) 745-0822 sounds like you need a valuable lecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Botcrawl (talk • contribs) 04:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Connect the dots? The phone number correlates to an individual connected professionally with Botcrawl and LATU in Gilbert, Arizona. For obvious reasons, I won't provide the individual's name, home address, or email address in this forum. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 13:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Funnyfarmofdoom, I've declined your proposed speedy deletion of Ralph Ketner, since the article does make several claims of notability, specifically that Ketner founded the Food Town chain of stores and the various philanthropic activities later in life. Speedy deletion tags should only be applied to obviously incorrect articles. This one, while unreferenced and needing a rewrite, does not fall under CSD:A7. Best, Sparthorse (talk) 06:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

These Character articles are under construction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blinkybillfan95 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Generally, you should have more substantial content before you go about creating a page. To be honest, I'm concerned you are an WP:SPA because not only are you ONLY making edits on a certain topic, but your username suggests you have a bias or agenda. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 08:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey , We have found a User doing Vandalism on the article Kunwar Amarjeet Singh & even without providing References . Plzz warn him or simply block him to do so ! Thanxx Rahulmothiya (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I am not an admin. And based on how quick you came to my userpage considering I didn't touch anything you would see, I suspect you are a sockpuppet of User:Divy1996. Do NOT continue to use this account to "have your way" on ANY article. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 21:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Actually he is my good friend & a schoolmate . and he just contacted me for this issue of vandalism done on Kunwar Amarjeet Singh . Rahulmothiya (talk) 21:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) That is still considered to be meatpuppetry and is still not allowed. Also, please see the definition of vandalism again since it is not vandalism.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Respected Sir, I really appreciate your timely guidance regarding the page I created, i.e., Chaudhary Sardar Khan. Since I, in my humble capacity, am a student (and not a scholar) of history, therefore I tried to share my knowledge about a man, who played his part in the struggle for Pakistan as Vice President of All India Muslim League, Ferozepur Chapter, India before 1947. I sincerely hope that my humble effort will be considered to be kept in the Wiki archive and will not be deleted. With profound regards, (Noe.Historian (talk) 22:09, 25 December 2011 (UTC))

Hi, i've written an contest for speedy deleting the 'Pinhani' rock band's article.As i told there, i cannot understand why it's tried to delete.Could you please tell me a reason for it, because i really want to know.I am the employee of the Pinhani, proffessional Turkish Rock Band, and entered necessary information into the Wikipedia English.All the info have taken from the official website of us.So, there's no reason to delete it.Please, let it publish on Wikipedia so that the people around the world learn about Pinhani.If something's needed to be changed, please message me about it, so i can change it.But i think everything is okey with it, cause i told, it's our band.Thank you..Best Regards, Eray Polat.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eraypolat03 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) First, you will need third-party, not just your own, references. Second, these references must cover Pinhani extensively, in order to meet our notability guideline.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reply.what do you suggest me to do about Pinhani article? i didnt write it with my own references, i collected all the information from www.pinhani.com. additionaly, as i said, i am a member of Pinhani.please give me an exact solution to get over this problem.Kind regards.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eraypolat03 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

When I said "own references", I meant the official website. Third-party sources are not affiliated with you, which means your official website doesn't count. We need references from other Internet outlets, especially journalism. Also, did you read my notice of your conflict of interest here?Jasper Deng (talk) 04:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello Funnyfarmofdoom, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lee Junho, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not rely on a page that does not exist. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 12:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

I have created a wikipedia page for one of the company "Innovative Technology Systems LLC" which is under ITS Group of companies. I've been asked to create this from our management end. But it has been nominated for speedy deletion. Can you please tell me for what reason it has been nominated for deletion. I want to know the specific reasons of deletion of my article and not the general ones mentioned in the wiki page. Kindly brief me on what factor I am missing out for it to be accepted for publishing. Nishaninan (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I've tagged your A1 speedy deletion tag of Shankarlal Parikh as hasty, since you tagged it the minute it was created. It's customary to allow editors at least 10 minutes from the time of creation before tagging it with A1 or A3, with at least an hour of time preferred. This gives them enough time to add any additional content, and doesn't scare them away with a warning that their article is about to be deleted.--Slon02 (talk) 05:22, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

because you want to delete my article J Brito? He is well known here in town and deserves a place brito wikipedia is well known because I try to delete has the same criteria as Fito Blanko--CCWPF (talk) 02:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

I created The Network Talent page in an attempt to inform about the company before the docu series comes out. I was hoping you could tell my what you chose to delete my page within moments of it being created and if you could possibly tell me how to create a page that won't cause you to delete it so hastily. Thanks for your help! Sarah.network (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

First of all, did you even read the warning on my walk page that links to WP:WMD? i have it there for a reason. Second, I wasn't actually the one who deleted it, I just mark it for review from an administrator. The deleting administrator was User:Fastily. Finally, I can say that it was deleted under WP:G11, which means it was exclusively promotional in nature. I suggest you read WP:SPAM before creating another article. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 02:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank You Please Tell Me You Know Joeblanc98 Joeblanc98 03:00 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Leave it with me, I check my deletion logs fairly often anyway. I'll make sure that he/she knows why they are being deleted, and if explanation doesn't work I'll salt the pages or, as a last resort, block the user. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for reviewing new pages created. Could you elaborate a bit about why this page does not possibly meet notability criteria?  « Saper // @talk »  15:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't think either you or Safiel are up to date with your Brazilian slang. The article asserts that he likes "pinto", which is a subtle way of calling him a pedophile, as "pinto" means "young man's (or, more commonly, young boy's) penis". Assuming the latter it's an attack page and needs to be tagged with G10 so it can be stripped more quickly. --NellieBly (talk) 02:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

And here I was thinking he liked beans ;) Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 02:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Really dangerous cars. :-) --NellieBly (talk) 02:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please undo this. She is a famous Georgian actress with two articles in Georgian and Russian wikipedia's, which I added. Thanks.--Andriabenia (talk) 20:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi there; thank you for your contributions. You recently nominated Nicolaj bjerre nielsen for {{speedy}} deletion, and as it stands you are clearly correct. But you posted your nomination only one minute after the article was posted. It is friendly, and more encouraging to the newcomers, to allow perhaps ten minutes before nominating. Happy wikying. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Funnyfarmofdoom,

My article entitled Elvis the Dog was recently declined due to reasons being given of 'an attempt to be humorous rather than factual'.

I would like to argue that everything mentioned in the article is all based on facts. The dog in question does resemble a sausage dog, is scared of noises and also used to be called Rufus but is now called Elvis. I can't see how my article can not be called factual unless you actually come to Darlington and see the dog for your own eyes? And surely you do not do this for every article that is written??

Yours sincerely,

Mr. J. Atkinson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.j.atkinson (talk • contribs) 22:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Can you cite a reliable secondary source that has significan coverage of the subject in question? Otherwise, this is not worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 22:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I've declined your A3 speedy deletion tag at SR-72(plane), because there was content in the article- it just wasn't showing up because of a mistake in the wiki markup. I strongly suggest looking at the history of articles, and some past revisions, before tagging for speedy deletion.--Slon02 (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

hello i re-submitted the article on icaros Inc i hope it will now be acceptable thanks avi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icaroinc (talk • contribs) 13:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Funny,

I sent a note to Bryce that had a concern and wanted you to know the challenge I am facing in making the entry compelte and factual. I am not advertising, but trying to educate the reader as to how city governments operate and the challenges they face and will face even more so in the future.

Here is the note I sent Bryce: Hello Bryce,

You have concerns that I am attempting to advertise, but that is not my intention. Since I work with government agencies I am sharing some of the challenges that they are experiencing. If you want me to delete some of that I can, but one of the reviewers asked for more substance and information on why this entry is a valuable one.Alohanorm (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, just checking on status of approvalAlohanorm (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I just looked at the page in question. Four of the six external links are not working. The other two appear to be advertisments for workshops. Additionally, the article still seems to be bordering on spam. See WP:SOAP and WP:ARTSPAM Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 22:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I invite you back to the discussion, as I think I have made a pretty decent case per WP:FUTURE and WP:NFF for a suitable redirect. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Funnyfarmofdoom! Thanks for helping to patrol new pages - it really makes a difference. I just saw your BLP PROD nomination of Jessie Keane, and I just wanted to say that I thought it was a bit too fast. It's good to wait at least 10-15 minutes after an article is created to tag it for deletion, as tagging things for deletion too early tends to scare/annoy new users. Also, it wasn't really eligible for BLP PROD as there were already external links in the article, one of which backed up her list of works (although I'm not sure whether it could have been called reliable or not). If you still want to nominate it for deletion, then it can always go to AfD. Also, I know this message has been a bit negative, but don't get me wrong - your help is very much appreciated. All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 01:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually, ignore the part about the external links - looking at it again I see they were only added to the article after you tagged it, with the exception of her official site (which probably doesn't qualify under the BLP PROD rules). Sorry for the confusion. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 01:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

I am the Public Relations Director for the footwear designer, Jean-Michel Cazabat. I am trying to create his Wikipedia page and I have received a notice saying that there are copyright issues, citing various articles on Jean-Michel. I attempted to send a 'Talk' message via my page, but since I am new to this system, I wanted to try to connect with whomever may be available to help.

As I stated in my 'Talk' page, there is no copyright issue - the bio and information listed in the article I created for Jean-Michel Cazabat is our company's public bio on his life and brand. Any other articles that use the same content are simply copying our official bio verbatim.

I hope this clears any issues up with this. Please let me know.

Thank you, Liz Auerbach — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauerbach (talk • contribs) 02:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Lauerbach, the reason I tagged that article you wrote for deletion, was because it was copied from another website. The copied text appeared to be copyrighted. In any case, the article is not written in a neutral tone. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, all articles should be written in a neutral point of view, citing reliable third party sources , such as newspapers, magazines, or books from other organizations with a strong reputation for fact checking. If you would like to write a new draft of the article, please consider using the Article Wizard. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 02:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello!

You tagged my page while I was working on it... Why would you do something like that. First of all page wasn't even finished so you couldn't tell it meets criteria for quick deletion. Therefore I would like to ask you to untag it so I can finish it. I would appreciate it. (Kachihawaii (talk) 03:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC))

It looked like spam to me, and the deleting admin thought it was spam too. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 22:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I just tagged the article with an A10 speedy. It duplicates existing article Treasure Island (2012 TV miniseries). The well-intended AFD is unneccessary. Though a redirect from the new to old might be worth consideration, such does not require an AFD... simply some housekeeping. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I never partook in this AfD. Did you leave this on the wrong page? Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 22:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Oops. Did so because you had performed edits to the article. Sorry for any confusion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

please note that "[Editing ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36]"should read [ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36] but I haven't found how to change the page title. Nor the "contest deletion" button.

SC36, just like SC34 is a standards body, not a company. As for SC34, SC36 standards are sold from the ISO secretariat, but this is for non profit.

You state that "the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34".

As indicated on the JTC1 Wikipedia page, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_JTC1)there is a lot of subcommittees, each with a distinct scope.

While SC34 deals with "Document description and processing languages", SC36 deals with Information technology for learning, education and training (ITLET). One of the key principle of JTC1 is that in the area of work of this SC, standards and technical reports will not duplicate work done by other ISO or IEC TCs, SCs, or WGs with respect to their component, specialty, or domain.

Sub committee structure and procedures are identical, which explains why the 2 pages look similar. But they deal with entirely different subject.

Standards issued by SC36 are of a very different nature of those of SC34. Mainly, they pertain to the formal educational domain. Issues related to accessibly, nomadic learning, participation information privacy are dealt with. In addition, standards done by other bodies, such as IMS Global or ADL, are promoted within SC36 as international standards. This is the case for SCORM and Common Cartridge, both referenced within Wikipedia. Work at the SC36 also builds up on standards described in Wikipedia, such as Dublin Core and Learning object metadata (LOM).

It is important that Wikipedia reflects the progression of standard work. Deleting article reflecting how old standards evolve and become internationally accepted, in my opinion, leave stakeholders with obsolete information.

Use of standards is crucial for interoperability and ensuring that schools and universities make sound decision and investment. This is a "credo" shared by all SC36 members (23 participants countries and 21 observing countries).

Hope this clarifies my intention to distinguish between both sub-comittees.

Regards,

Pierre — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjguay (talk • contribs) 14:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I actually noticed that they were different articles, so I undid my nomintation for speedy deletion. However, I tried to move the page myself and discovered that the title was on our WP:BLACKLIST. I'm not an admin, so I can't override it. I'm not quite sure why, but you can ask someone to change the page title at WP:RM. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 21:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

Can you please tell me where to find your comments on the article I submitted?

Thank you,

Johnfranz (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quantance Incorporated Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 21:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Funnyfarmofdoom. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Depreciation of goodwill/dilution in trademark law. i was an exchange student and was asked towrite this article for one of my classes. i didn't get to choose the title or the topic of the article. nevertheless i am supposed to get a grade very soon for this article. i understand that i might have made some mistakes while writing it but since this is important for my semester, would it please be possible for you to leave it until then? Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.2.243.189 (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Funnyfarmofdoom. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nitz 'N' Sony, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, you placed a Wikify tag on my new page, Defensive attribution hypothesis. I went back and reviewed things and made changes. Should I remove your tag now?

Oh, thanks for the help!

Dr Ashton (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

You reviewed this page, and left this note:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept unsourced articles, or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please cite reliable, third-party sources in the article. Third-party sources are needed so the information can be verified, and so the notability of the topic can be established.

Well, he didn't have a {{reflist}}, he did have sources going to the New York Times and another local newspaper. Obviously, your comment rather confused him when he was told that he didn't have any RS's... You've obviously done a lot at AfC so I trust this wasn't meant like it sounded. Thanks, Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 17:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I was just curious as to what I could change in order to have 'Hyatt Legal Plans' become an approved page. ThanksLawyer24738 (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

The reason I declined it was because the products and services section reads like an advertisement. Check out WP:EMBED and try to rewrite that section in prose. Then you should try to resubmit it. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 23:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Sooo, "Internet Idol" is not as important as "American Idol" because... only rich Americans with their arbitrary TV shows are allowed in Wikipedia?

Private TV SHOW "American Idol" deserves full article, but world wide, fair system is too... democratic? Right... in America, fair competition is not allowed.

"CORRUPTION... is why we WIN!" - American guy in "Syriana" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawelkolasa (talk • contribs) 02:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Admin,

There was a page entitled Sparrow SMS and has been deleted just now.

I would like to request consideration with support via following reasons. 1. Sparrow SMS is a successful product being sold in the country 2. It has a major position in the market 3. We have a good web presence 4. The offcial facebook fan page marks a 30000+ fans http://facebook.com/sparrowsms 5. The service has not been discontinued 6. Any updates are provided in the official blog http://blog.sparrowsms.com

acpmasquerade 06:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. If you REALLY object to the deletion of this page, go to WP:REFUND. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 07:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I blanked the entire article because not only is it an unsourced BLP, but it's got far too much identifying information about a minor. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I recently created page "Jonathan Mildenhall" and was flagged for lack of sources. I have since added sources but seem to be getting hung up for not having a reference list of some sort. I have read the Help Page and tried to look up steps on creating a Reference list but it is very confusing. Can you give me some quick instruction on what I need to do for my page to go live?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmildenhall (talk • contribs) 03:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

To make a reference list, you need to add {{reflist}} to the end of the article. We have toolbars to help add references. Read WP:REFB for more information. Once you add them, be sure to delete the PROD I placed on the top of the article. But don't worry, you have 7 days to work on it. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 03:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

— madman 02:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

	Trophy
	This is your gift from me. Go to the talk page,and resolve it if you wanted to help me. Thank you. Lee, Eungki C. (talk) 07:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I have declined your {{db-web}} speedy deletion nomination of Open Sankore, because the subject of he article is not web content, so it does qualify under that criterion. You may like to PROD the article, for lack of evidence of notability, instead. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. I noticed you were using Twinkle to place templates. Twinkle occasionally has a bug where it won't mark pages as patrolled after templating a page, even if the interface says it did. Make sure after the page refreshes that the page was in fact marked as patrolled so that I or other new page patrollers aren't stepping on each other's toes. Thanks! elektrikSHOOS (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll pay better attention!

Hi, just wanted to respond on your recent review of the Norbar Torque Wikipedia page. Thank you for your comments.

Firstly the number one reason for deeming Norbar suitable for an encyclopaedic entry is that they are the World's Leading Torque Specialist as documented on the following websites amongst many others: http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/detail.aspx?NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=422953&SubjectId=2 http://www.uktisoutheast.com/eventdisplay.aspx?id=1720 http://www.andrewsfasteners.co.uk/l_partners.php http://www.toolbank.com/b/NOR http://www.railtex.co.uk/exhibitor-list/norbar-torque-tools-ltd http://www.connectingindustry.com/story.asp?storycode=201262

I decided not to include this statement in the Wiki entry because I felt it contravened the Wikipedia regulations which state the article should not be written like an advert or deemed promotional in any way. However, I am more than happy to include the statement 'World's leading torque specialist' (with references) if that helps to quantify why Norbar should be entitled to a Wiki page. Your thoughts on this point would be very much appreciated.

In addition, Norbar torque has played a pivotal role in the development of torque tools in the UK firstly and now across the world for 75 years, I was attempting to get that message across in the History section, but perhaps I could make this a little clearer? Again if this would help when re-submitting please let me know.

Thirdly, Norbar's role was integral to the development of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine which as its Wiki page indicates was vital to the development of British Aviation in the 20th century. I was planning to edit the Merlin page to explain this and create a reference link back to the Norbar page to back this up. Is this ok?

Finally I thought it worth mentioning that Norbar's biggest competitors in the global torque market are:

• Atlas Copco http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Copco
• Snap On Tools http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snap_on
• Gedore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gedore
• Wera Tools http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wera_Tools

All of which have their own Wikipedia pages, two of which are smaller companies than Norbar in terms of revenue, reach and staff and have far less detail or justification for having a Wiki in their wikipedia articles. If you can let me know what these manufacturers have included in their pages that Norbar's is currently missing, that would be much appreciated.

Many thanks, StephenfGraham (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)StephenfGraham

Adding a statement to that effect (cited, of course) would actually be great to assert why the company is important.

A few other notes:

• Your article has two references sections. Also, don't use Bare URLs when citing.
• Wikipedia is not to be used as a source per WP:CIRCULAR.
• Try to condense the history down a little. It takes up much of the article. Usually it would only be a single section.
• Infoboxes are a GREAT way to jazz up an article. Try Template:infobox company.

Try to make these changes and then resubmit it. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 20:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Great, no problem at all. Thanks Funnyfarmofdoom I'll make these changes and resubmit. StephenfGraham (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)StephenfGraham

Hi Nicholas, I've made some edits to Article for Creation/EarthCam, as you requested. As you'll see I've added references to outside sources to verify the claims being made in the article. I believe this is what you were suggesting when you requested more citations be added. Please let me know if this is what you're looking for, and if not, please provide more insight on how I can improve the article. Thank You! Joe Nizza (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the tag on Dota 2; as the primary contributor to the page, I'm always interested in how it can be improved, of course. Could you tell me what you believe is out-of-date on the page? By my reckoning, it would be minimal, considering that the game is not released yet, so most information would be future tense. DarthBotto _talk•cont 05:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Whoops, my mistake. I thought it was out based on their steam page. It even lists updates to it. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 05:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for reviewing my article. i added a couple of sentences to further explain why placeme is not a typical tracking app. thx Mikealohar (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Mike

Hi

You left this message at my article

This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the speedy deletion criteria A7 and/or guidelines on music-related topics. Please provide more information on why this musical artist or musical recording is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

Can I please know what is it that you require me to do in order to get this one passed?

This musical group is one of the pipe band in Malaysia (one of a few) and they represent the scene from Malaysia. It would be good to have a reference in the wiki for them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirulm3 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

When I looked up the the most interesting man in world he refers to king dirty the page was deleted why?

Respond to: doxauto@yahoo.com Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.8.126.95 (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Rlg000raz (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)I guess I apologize for making the RAZ.I.EL page, but I need help making a Wiki page because I'm a singer, rapper, and songwriter trying to get known, I want my page to be related to Nayer ( Singer ), Pitbull ( Rapper ), and The Black Eyed Peas ( Group ) because they are my main sources of inspiration. And I like Raziel better now Rlg000raz (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 07:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC).

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 01:55, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

My Forlorn Junk Heap was Deleted and My april fools Kung Fu Panda was deleted. Why is this? Please answer soon. Oh and I don't have a talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.76.94 (talk) 19:27, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nah, articles are taboo to April Fools' jokes.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

---

Message delivered by Dominic at 09:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Thanks for your efforts in the January 2012 MTC Drive! Cloudbound (talk) 21:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Twitchtv logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, also to you my question, see [1]. --WSC ^® 18:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Don't understand why you have added 'citation style' to this article.Oranjblud (talk) 12:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey Funnyfarmofdoom. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

I am fairly new to editing Wikipedia so your assistance would be appreciated. You removed the copyright attribution of the photo. Was this because it was wrong or unnecessary? I have put it back in the meantime as it is consistent with a number of articles I have already created. Should they all be removed? Braddy55 (talk) 16:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi there! Before tagging the regulars for not marking new pages as patrolled, you might like to get up to date. If you have any questions about the new system, don't hesitate to ask me. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

I had to delete a portion was added to it because without proof. As the links lead to some general topics denies what has been written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.60.65.22 (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Than please add an edit summary Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 17:02, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Very many thanks for keeping watch - and taking action ! ... Regards, --DLMcN (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)