A tag has been placed on David Binder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JPilborough^{-Leave Message} 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe the owner of a copyrighted text is willing to allow it to be licensed for use in Wikipedia and elsewhere, please see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions in how to proceed. Until then, you might consider creating a new article that does not use copyrighted text. Please take into consideration our restrictions on notability, conflict of interest and advertising, of course. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been deleted, mainly due to copyright concerns, but also under WP:CSD#G11 - blatant advertising. Essentially this article made no verifiable claims to notability, which makes it unacceptable under our inclusion policies. More importantly, however, the text was a blatant copyright violation. You claim to own the copyright for this text, which is fair enough: please send an e-mail to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org from an e-mail address affiliated to the site, asserting that you own the copyright and that you wish to license it under the GFDL. In fact, given the additional concerns with advertising, spam, and vanity, this text is unlikely to be of much use. Please do not recreate the article with this text unless and until the permission e-mail has been received and confirmed by the OTRS staff at the e-mail address above.

On another note, I would like you to read WP:COI, our policy about editing articles in which you may have a conflict of interest. From your username it appears likely that you have a substantial conflict of interest in this article - this usually means that you should not be editing or creating such articles, except to correct obvious factual errors. Happy‑melon 21:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]