Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

I moved Numbered highways in Ohio by county to the Draft namespace. There is a lot of work to be done to make it useful to readers. I started to clean it up but the entries I did are all red links. You can find the article at Draft:Numbered highways in Ohio by county now. - GB fan 11:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

I did make one blue link before I made the page: Numbered highways in Lake County, Ohio

I saw that and that alone saved it from deletion. All the rest of the links on the page went to redlinks that will never have an article as they are bad names. When I started to cleanup the list with good article names they were all coming up redlinks still. The page as it was going to be wasn't going to be helpful with that one blue link embedded in a sea of red. It is better to start building the underlying articles and then moving the draft back into the main space. - GB fan 13:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Got it, I'm going to be making those articles at a slow pace, So I think I'll fix the draft as they get finished. Cards84664 (talk) 13:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Eastboundand Westboundare redundant, because the directions are already implied by leftand right. Also, the category should be of the form [[Category:Xxx succession templates]]. Useddenim (talk) 13:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Note that the idea was there long before I joined Wikipedia. It was used on the Louis stokes station article because there are different named stations on each side of the road east of 16th street. Cards84664 (talk) 13:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

In East cleveland, the stations are not adjacent on each side of the road, and have different names. In the eastern side of cleveland, the stations are in the middle, but the bus lanes go around them. Lets say there is a 16th eastbound station and a 16th westbound station. There are quite a few of these, and while they are close to each other, some have the names of "20th eastbound" and "21st westbound". Again, the stations are only in both directions west of 16th street. Cards84664 (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

This is theoretically what the infoboxes for the HealthLine station articles would look like: User:Cards84664/sandbox7 Cards84664 (talk) 22:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hmm… I'll have to give that some thought. Useddenim (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice on sandbox7 that the HealthLine template is used starting on East 9th Cards84664 (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

You should probably be using {{rail-interchange}} instead of direct [[Image:]] calls in the infoboxes. Useddenim (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

What is the point of all of your additions to this template? There are only a total of five have articles for the five groups and 13 items listed (Heavy rail, Light rail, Bus Rapid transit, Trolley lines, and Bus routes; 9/12, 55 Cleveland State Line, 55A, 55B, 55C, 66 Red, 67 Blue, 67A Green, B, C, E—the last three not in any logical order—HealthLine, and List of bus routes), and the entire row of Trolley lines is non-existent. Until there is more content for this topic, I suggest that it should revert back to its previous Cleveland Rapid status. Useddenim (talk) 19:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 16 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas State Highway Spur 16 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 15 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas State Highway Loop 15 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 14 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 13 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 10 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 6 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas Park Road 5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Texas State Highway Loop 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Contains no text. Does not add to the encyclopedia without text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

What are you trying to do with Template:Infobox road/shieldmain/USA? –Fredddie™ 01:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Nothing now, I didn't know you could set image size by height. I tried to make a separate template for wide US shields, at least until Chinissai made the correction. Cards84664 (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Also, don't do this: [1]. Use your sandbox or Special:ExpandTemplates instead. –Fredddie™ 01:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

is massive. I was reading an AFD on which you'd commented and your signature partially covers what people above you have written. Please could you change it to something a little smaller? Thank you in advance for your co-operation. Patient Zero^talk 13:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

I was coming here to say the same thing. Perhaps you could try something like this:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Cards84664 (talk)

Here is the previous version for comparison:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.Cards84664 (talk)

- MrX 14:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Implemented. Cards84664 (talk) 14:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Instead of Cards84664 (talk)[2] might I suggest Cards84664 (talk)? --Guy Macon (talk) 23:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to suggest Guy Macon's signature format. Plain text is best. –Fredddie™ 23:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Cards84664 (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

You'll want to keep WP:USRD/S&L updated with page names. Ideally, we should be creating articles on highway systems using the actual names of those state highway systems from the appropriate legislation. That's why Michigan has Michigan State Trunkline Highway System as its title, prefixing it with the state name. I've been slowly trying to get various Interstate and US Highway lists converted over to the templates, splitting a few lists out as needed. Imzadi 1979 → 04:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

FWIW, articles with an infobox and no text could be considered to meet WP:CSD#A3 or WP:CSD#A1, so you want to get some text on those really soon before they get deleted. --Rschen7754 07:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

I'd encourage you not to create more articles like Numbered highways in Lake County, Ohio. That concept was deprecated many years ago as a maintenance burden. They were only ever created to serve as the lead article for by-county featured topics, which have also been deprecated. Imzadi 1979 → 05:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. I notice you have recently been adding station code symbols to the top of the infobox in a lot of Japanese station articles. While that seems to work OK for some stations, have you looked at the results it produces in larger station articles such as Yokohama Station? I'm concerned about the way that the large number of symbols overwhelms the actual name of the station at the top (which could possibly be improved by reducing the symbol size slightly), but more problematic is what happens to the push-pin map used lower down in the infobox (these maps are in the process of being added to all infoboxes). As the map uses the text in the "name" field, all the symbol icons also get repeated in the push-pin map. Even with just one symbol (as in Kita Shin-Yokohama Station) this starts to get messy, but with more, it gets a bit out of hand. I wonder if there is a better way to get around this? Unfortunately, the "symbol" field provided in Template:Infobox station doesn't appear to be able to cope with individual station symbols, so maybe the symbols could be put in the "type" field instead? What do you think? How do station articles for other countries tackle this issue, as presumably it is not specific to Japanese station articles? --DAJF (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

My idea for Yokohama is that the inboxes should be split, like Shinjuku station. As for the minimap, I'm gonna keep experimenting for a little bit until I find something that works. Cards84664 (talk) 00:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

My solution is an icon parameter that appears above the name, taking it to the infobox station talk page now. Cards84664 (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I saw your request at the Template talk:Infobox station page, and I agree that will probably be the best way to do it. --DAJF (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Another problem I noticed is that many of the station code symbols lack alternative texts (WP:ALT). This is undesirable for screen readers. — Peterwhy 22:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Business Interstate Highway Articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dough4872 21:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations! You've managed to make nearly every article dealing with the GCRTA nearly impossible to edit without difficulty, thanks to your arbitrary abbreviations. (Is "A" for Airport or Ashby or Attleboro or Avalon?) Therefore, I am reverting your changes (but will keep the abbreviations).

You must keep a couple of things in mind:

• Wikipedia must be editable by everyone, so your template abbreviations make thing incomprehensible to anybody else;
• You have no idea where and how a template will spread. (As an example, I wrote {{BSsplit}} because I got tired of writing out the same bit of wikitext over and over; it’s now used so widely that it is edit-protected as a Highly visible template.)

Useddenim (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

(pinging Useddenim) I don't think each RTA line needs to have a separate infobox style, especially considering the network has multiple interchange stations (and the line names don't need to be in both |lines= and |type=). Also, it might be better to use |inline=yes for {{Rail color box}} since the network is rapid transit and not heavy rail. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

The styles were put in place because of similar station designs and names, like Southington (RTA Blue Line Rapid Transit station) and Southington (RTA Green Line Rapid Transit station). Cards84664 (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

The rollbacks were because of the non-intuitive abbreviations in {{GCRTA stations}}. I just wasn't going to take the time to plow through 75 pages and manually revert the disruption. Go ahead and consolidate the formatting. (BTW, the Lines column of List of RTA Rapid Transit stations#Stations needs to be fixed so that it is actually sortable.) Useddenim (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Just to note, the lines listed in |type= are a mimic of the design formats used in CTA and MTA article infoboxes. Cards84664 (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of state routes in New York, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of state routes in New York and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of state routes in New York during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

I see you edited our page. I am a member of the CTRC are you? We would prefer any additions to our page be cleared through the CTRC before they are added to our page.

@Sparky1997: Hi. I was updating a template linking Cleveland's union terminal. The Amtrak service was noted because the terminal was still open during that time.

Just note, Wikipedia is open for anyone to edit, outside group policies have no effect here, like how I made improvements to the Tower City Center article, and the GCRTA has no say in it. To ensure accuracy, you can add references to each general statement. Cards84664 (talk) 00:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Adelbert Road (RTA Rapid Transit station), Cards84664!

Wikipedia editor Yashovardhan Dhanania just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Don't you think the two bright images of "Adelbert Road WESTBOUND" and "EASTBOUND" should be removed or placed somewhere else. They don't really look nice this way. Also, a caption is needed.

To reply, leave a comment on Yashovardhan Dhanania's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Yashovardhan (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Please restore the {{Road disambiguation}} templates you removed a couple of months ago from many disambiguation pages. These templates include hidden markup that is needed for various disambiguation maintenance tools to function correctly. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Care to tell me what you're talking about in particular? I remember replacing disambiguation pages with redirects to Ohio highway pages, not just removing templates. Cards84664 (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

For example:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ohio_State_Route_102&diff=prev&oldid=771988154
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ohio_State_Route_112&diff=prev&oldid=771988194
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ohio_State_Route_127&diff=prev&oldid=771988214
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ohio_State_Route_194&diff=prev&oldid=771988230

and about 20 more. In each of these edits, you removed {{Road disambiguation}} and added Category:Ohio road disambiguation pages. I know it's tough to remember these kinds of things two months after the fact, but I just noticed these pages today. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for undoing my work. Please revert yourself, as you are adding unnecessary disambinguation. (See WP:DISAMBIG and WP:USSTATION.) Useddenim (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Why is it an issue now? I've been following a format that has been in place for 9+ years. Cards84664 (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Because it's never too late to fix things. Useddenim (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I have noticed you made a whole bunch of changes to the RTA Rapid Transit stations list. A lot of the changes you made were unncessary and excessive. The main focus of the RTA station list is mostly the rail lines only (Red, Green/Blue), not including the two bus rapid transit lines (Healthline and CSU Line). I am willing to help add a list of stations exclusively for the Healthline and whenever the future article for the Cleveland State Line is created, but please do not add the BRT station/stops to the main list or the blank rail boxes. It makes the list look disorganized. Thank you for understanding. GETONERD84 (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to hear your two cents on this: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts/archive1, when you have a moment. If enough people say they support this on the page, we'll get another piece of rail-related featured content on Wikipedia. It seems like you need at least three supporters for a list to reach FL status, and two have confirmed their support so far. Jackdude101 (Talk) 00:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting the Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts article during its featured list review (it passed)! I am now putting the Disneyland Railroad article through a featured article review here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Disneyland Railroad/archive1. You are welcome to comment on that one, also. Jackdude101 01:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornell Road (RTA Bus Rapid Transit stations) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornell Road (RTA Bus Rapid Transit stations) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

The new images in the infoboxes are entirely replaceable using text. Using images isn't good for accessibility and using low-resolution raster images especially makes them look blurry on displays with high pixel density. Please revert (I'll modify the header template so it can replicate the layout). Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 04:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Adams/Wabash   200S 45E

I have modified {{Infobox station/Header CTA}} to match the images. When readding the template to articles, please use Infobox station's |custom_header= instead of |name= so that the correct metadata is used. I've named the parameter for the 200S/45E "block", although if there's a better name for it please suggest one. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 10:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Grid could be a better name, adhering to the Chicago grid system. Also, I'm not seeing any colors. What is the name of the color parameter? Cards84664 (talk) 13:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Cermak–McCormick Place   4000W 5100S

Cermak– McCormick Place   4000W 5100S

Another thing to note, there should probably be a parameter for each line of text, to avoid text size errors like Cermak–McCormick Place. Cards84664 (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

It also seems the grid text shrinks whenever the first line is too long. Cards84664 (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

The colours should work in Chrome now, as Chrome still requires legacy formatting for some reason.

Use <br> in the infobox; the lack of line breaking is deliberate (and also because it's not possible to my knowledge to stop the divs from overflowing) as the font size is set manually by the module using the functions and . The module automatically detects br tags and changes the font size to match. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Got it. One problem though, I'm using safari and I don't see colors. Cards84664 (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

No colors in chrome for me as well. Cards84664 (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

(forgot to mention: |grid= can be used instead of |block= now.)

What version of Safari are you using, and on what OS? It works for me on both macOS Sierra and iOS 10. (If you're using the Windows version, it hasn't been updated for about five years. Use Firefox instead.)

I'll see what's wrong in Chrome. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

10.1 Safari on MacOS 10.12.4. Cards84664 (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

It should be fixed on both Safari and Chrome now. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed, starting reverts. Cards84664 (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Note, I'm not reverting Quincy for now. Cards84664 (talk) 14:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, for Quincy and the two airport stations the image might have to be kept for now, the latter two because of the airport icon which isn't a Unicode character. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Try Unicode Code Point U+2708 (✈). Useddenim (talk) 15:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: What should we do with Clark/Lake and Roosevelt? Cards84664 (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Adding two of the template consecutively should suffice. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Incidentally, why does State/Lake use "0E/0W" even though Roosevelt uses "1E/1W"? Do they mean something different or are the signs just like this in reality? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 15:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

I think it's because the station exits are closer together at State/Lake. Cards84664 (talk) 15:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035:

State/Lake   0E/0W 200N

State/Lake   0E/0W 200N

So there isn't a way to remove extra Grey space? Cards84664 (talk) 15:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Also, how should Jefferson Park Transit Center be formatted? Cards84664 (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

I've added |size= (expressed as a multiplier with default of 1). I've tried formatting the Transit Center article's infobox, although placing the Metra logo in |name= breaks the metadata and there should be a way to do that through {{Infobox station}} or another custom header template instead. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: In addition, I noted the two different exits at Washington station (CTA Red Line). Cards84664 (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Lastly, I think we should change the Orange line's hex color, it's the only outlier of what the CTA has. Cards84664 (talk) 16:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

The colors were taken from the official CTA website in 2013 (according to the template history), although maybe they've changed. Were the images from a third-party website? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: These images were taken from ctagifts.com, yesterday. I've added them in to test, purge the cache. Cards84664 (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adelbert Road (RTA Bus Rapid Transit stations) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HealthLine bus stops until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirsutism (talk) 17:48, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

The Wilson Station page says "demolition of track five will start soon". i know you may not be the person who wrote that in there, but as the last person to edit the page, i was wondering what that was supposed to me, since there is no track 5 at wilson s — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999 (talk • contribs) 08:07, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Numbered highways in Alabama, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Numbered highways in Alabama and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Numbered highways in Alabama during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Fredddie™ 21:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Numbered highways in Alabama, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

There is a way to change all the boxes to bullets just by changing the "time" parameter. However, I don't see any benefits in adding the bullets as opposed to boxes, especially when you removed flexible service templates to add bullets that must be changed manually. As such, I have reverted your bullet additions for now. epicgenius (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Also, bullets are fixed height images whereas the boxes are formatted text. The latter changes size correctly as display parameters change, the former can cause spacing errors in the diagrams. Useddenim (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

What a GREAT page this is! So glad that it's possible to contribute. Typing on my cell so I must be brief: since so many animals etc. are mentioned LOONS should be in the list as well. Many fond memories, far from home living in Germany and suddenly homesick.

Ralph Nolte ralphdn@gmx.de (remove if not appropriate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ralphdno (talk • contribs) 23:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

@Ralphdno: I think you have me confused with someone else. Cards84664 (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

hi Why remove my edit to Longest baseball streak. the 1880 White Stockings have a streak of 21 with a tie but a true 20 game streak without a tie - their tie was after their 1st win and before 2nd? Would you prefer they appear in the table twice? 21 with tie and 20 without? That would be awkward and care would need to be taken so they are not double counted in enumeration of teams. I have not checked the other teams with ties but the 1916 Giants had a tie after the 12th win breaking up their streak (as I noted in an edit to the 2nd paragraph) and 1880 White Stockings had tie after 1st win and leaving them with 20 consecutive wins thereafter. The streaks with ties are not officially recognized but the non-tie streaks are - shouldnt the 1880 White Stockings be recognized for 20 consecutive wins? Do you need a cite for the White Stockings having the tie after 1 win? None of the other items in the table have a cite and I'm sure you have already looked up the data to know it was correct.

Also do you consider yourself the main editor of this page? I suggest the carat ^ denoting the ties should be on the number of wins not the team names. And the text in the intro paragraphs could be modified to be clearer that this list is a list of "wins without a loss" and hence includes ties and not only consecutive wins. I have ideas for such text but its pointless to make edits if you are just going to undo them. Perhaps we could/should discuss this over email (lschleng@alum.mit.edu). 12:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)lschlenger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lschlenger (talk • contribs)

@Lschlenger: The 1880 White Stockings have a 21 game streak that includes a tie. The extra mention of that tie isn't necessary because it clutters the table. Cards84664 (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Cards84664. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Numbered highways in Ohio by county".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

I doubt that just the maps without discussion are enough to make an article. I suggest you add some text and references, or else consider adding the material to Commons. (and I hope you;bve made sure it's not a copyvio.) DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Cards84664, thanks for creating Island & Suffolk (SEPTA station)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources asap - without them this is in danger of being tagged for deletion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

@Boleyn: I'll add a reference to the septa trolley map, but this is not a new issue. For example, many stations on the Muni Metro are unsourced, due to the names not actually appearing on the map. Same goes for SEPTA. I only discovered the "unnamed" stations because they are named and listed on Apple Maps transit maps. Cards84664 (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome. Mitch32^{(The many fail: the one succeeds.)} 21:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I see the issue and have rectified. Mitch32^{(The many fail: the one succeeds.)} 21:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but there was no reason to move my Lee Road sandbox to mainspace. It wasn't even close to ready. Next time, give me a hoot you're going to move something out of my space, and do so. There is an unwritten rule on Wikipedia about editing other people's sandboxes without their permission. Mitch32^{(The many fail: the one succeeds.)} 05:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop disturving edit on pages or undoning edits if you do not know about the historic railroads. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJ Pachano (talk • contribs) 11:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

@AJ Pachano: You keep removing mentions of minor stations along each line. I recommend you double check your sources. Cards84664 (talk) 11:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

@Cards84664: if you read about the historic railroads you know about the passenger routes because, each former services is a unknown lines like Main Line and seperated toward routes like Chicago - Louisville so please do not concern because of the history read about the historic railroads just so you know about that.

Apparently you want WP:SPI and you have to fill out a form and provide evidence. I have never done this. I will be keeping an eye on this and jump in if there is anything I can do to help. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) At SPI, it's best if you can provide diffs that show how the two (or more) accounts edit in similar ways. It's even better if you can demonstrate over a period of time. Hope this helps; good luck. –Fredddie™ 04:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)