I am what I am. jch.com/jch

I know your name is down, but the project had fallen by the wayside - so i'm trying to rejeuvinate it Happysailor ^(Talk) 22:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am eager to cleanup bodysurfing, but, I am looking for an equivalent sport that is Good.

Thanks for uploading File:LuiKangArtistSudburyMA.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Regions, aka Cortical Areas

Amortized predictions and cortical columns in PC.

Medical Imaging Coordinate systems, especially Brain, anatomical, MNI - https://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/CoordinateSystems = https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CoordinateSystems

Middlesex was part of the Mass Bay Colony.

Specular Hilite

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/arterial-tortuosity-syndrome

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Predictive_coding&action=edit&redlink=1

http://www.martinos.org/resources/aan-atlas - ascending arousal network (AAN) https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/brain.2015.0378 The Structural Connectome of the Human Central Homeostatic Network.

Fix Molly Potter if needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Timeline_of_human_prehistory

Susanna North Martin was hanged on July 19, 1693 - see stone marker from Salem: http://www.jch.com/jch/cool/SusannahMartin.jpg make that a PD image.h Publish PD version of 1856 Walling Sudbury Map http://www.hardenbergh.org/places/sudbury/Walling1856/Sudbury1856WallingPD.jpg

Make UU the most awesomest on Religion Portal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wire-frame_model - confuses wireframe display with pre Solid Modeling CAD.

Make a link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_eye_hypothesis to Cozolino http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_expression http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Cozolino

List_of_Unitarian,_Universalist,_and_Unitarian_Universalist_churches

Add Richard Schwartz, Ph.D.

Subject: Re: streamtube visualization gallery Hi Jan, Please ignore the previous email - I hit return too soon... http://www.sci.utah.edu/gallery2/v/sci/visualization/StellarMag.htm Here are a few more stream line/tube/surface visualizations: http://www.sci.utah.edu/gallery2/v/sci/visualization/tornado_Milan.png.html http://www.sci.utah.edu/gallery2/v/sci/visualization/argon-20.png.html http://www.sci.utah.edu/gallery2/v/cibc/DISC_cutaway_001.png.html Cheers, Chris

Re add of Hayne's Garrison

People who have high levels of what is known as eudaimonic well-being — the kind of happiness that comes from having a deep sense of purpose and meaning in life (think Mother Teresa) — showed very favorable gene-expression profiles in their immune cells. They had low levels of inflammatory gene expression and strong expression of antiviral and antibody genes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/13/magazine/13Psychology-t.html?pagewanted=all

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amygdala#Subdivisions_image_vs._nuclei

Make some cohernet notions of "eye gaze" from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_contact http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaze http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_tracking - "point of gaze" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_attention - "means of eye-gazing" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonverbal_communication "eye gaze" link to eye contact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_eye_hypothesis

Crosby, J.R., Monin, B, & Richardson, D. (2008) Where do we look during potentially offensive behavior? Psychological Science, 19(3), 226-229.

Hi! Thanks for your efforts to properly direct and create articles related to eye gaze. You seem like a really passionate editor and I hope you stay around. Come by the Teahouse any time with more great questions.

	Great Question Badge
	Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum. There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi ^{t | c} 22:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bodysurfinyon, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia from me. You asked a good question at WikiProject Psychology, and nobody has answered you. My guess is that nobody really knows what to answer you. So my advice is, let it rest for now, edit other articles and once you have a bit more experience, be bold and make the change you think is the best. If people disagree, they might revert you edit, or start a discussion with you, and then you're talking... Kind regards! Lova Falk talk 17:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bodysurfinyon. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 21:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

I left a comment about this here. --Devin Murphy (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment in regards to your follow-up comment. --Devin Murphy (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bodysurfinyon. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 14:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dougweller (talk) 14:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Yon - Wanna work together on Hypocrisy? My version's been stable for almost a year, but I'm sure you can make it better. - Thanks; LeoRomero (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It isn't clear from this draft if there is an article draft here. What is the subject of the article? There are no references, so we cannot establish notability. Either start over, or rework in accordance with standard policies and guidelines. There is likely to be an article here, but I can't see a draft of an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bodysurfinyon/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bodysurfinyon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Large scale brain networks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Large scale brain networks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]