Hello, I'm Ferien. An edit you recently made to David Elazar seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David Elazar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Carl Panzram, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at A Rake's Progress, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You have added unsourced content to several articles. I have cleaned up some of your edits, but I have better things to do and some of your edits appear to be inaccurate as well as unsourced. These edits are either original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia, or you have failed to cite the source on which you based the content. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Luger pistol, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charles J. Guiteau. Serols (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]