Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ando Masahashi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Padillah (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but I highly recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (32.97.110.58) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 21:25, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BigPimpinBrah. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Maharana Pratap because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of breweries in Texas has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of breweries in Texas was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/bigweeniestyles?rf=197096520321540/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Big data, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Friday the 13th: A New Beginning plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Doneil Henry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. I changed the Doneil Henry goal tally to one, because somebody had actually initially removed it, with no reason for doing so. Even in his wikipedia article itself, it says that he scored on 31 May 2014. Since he is moving to a new club, many people will be looking at his page, so it should be updated correctly. The source itself is already in the page, but his goal tally keeps getting updated to 0, when it is actually 1 in MLS play for the 2014 season. Even though the "Trillium Cup" seems like a cup match, it's actually an MLS regular season match, so it counts as a domestic appearance and goal.

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Goonies. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Penguins of Madagascar without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:52, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Penguins of Madagascar with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Penguins of Madagascar with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's tagged with {{plot}}, so I think there's at least a valid reason to remove content. Notice the template is being removed as well. ekips39 (talk) 21:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Penguins of Madagascar with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IronGargoyle, did you see my comment above? if so, do you agree? ekips39 (talk) 21:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dspradau. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Government of Canada— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Dspradau → talk  14:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were invited to explain on Talk: Uechi-ryū your continued changes of the order of Major Organizations. Kindly do so. Editors have been asked to review the situation, so if you have a better OBJECTIVE way to order them kindly state it.98.227.140.14 (talk) 03:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY - lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The company's website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaldu Sari Nabati Indonesia LLC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaldu Sari Nabati Indonesia LLC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 32.97.110.58! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Blackwell, Oklahoma appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 32.97.110.58. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaldu Sari Nabati Indonesia LLC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ad Astra (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AidenTEM (talk) 10:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Muffin of the English. An edit that you recently made to Robert Zemeckis seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Muffin of the English (talk) 16:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Zemeckis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.